C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS › Subpart 1.07—Enforcement; Civil and Criminal Penalty Proceedings

33 C.F.R. § 1.07-15

Hearing Officer

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Hearing Officer has no other responsibility, direct or supervisory, for the investigation of cases referred for the assessment of civil penalties. The hearing officer may take action on a case referred by any District Commander.

(b) The Hearing Officer decides each case on the basis of the evidence before him, and must have no prior connection with the case. The Hearing Officer is solely responsible for the decision in each case referred to him.

(c) The Hearing Officer is authorized to administer oaths and issue subpoenas necessary to the conduct of a hearing, to the extent provided by law.

[CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978, as amended by CGD 87-008a, 52 FR 17554, May 11, 1987; USCG-2002-12471, 67 FR 41331, June 18, 2002]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1986–1986 · leading case: United States v. Chotin Transp., Inc., 649 F. Supp. 356 (S.D. Ohio 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Chotin Transp., Inc., 649 F. Supp. 356 (S.D. Ohio 1986). “33 CFR 1.07-15(b).” (Id. at 66-67.) II. OPINION The questions presented in this case are whether the decisions of the Coast Guard in imposing the civil penalties was supported by substantial evidence and whether the amounts of the penalties imposed were arbitrary and capricious.”
— 33 C.F.R. § 1.07-15(b) — 1 case
United States v. Chotin Transp., Inc., 649 F. Supp. 356 (S.D. Ohio 1986). “33 CFR 1.07-15(b).” (Id. at 66-67.) II. OPINION The questions presented in this case are whether the decisions of the Coast Guard in imposing the civil penalties was supported by substantial evidence and whether the amounts of the penalties imposed were arbitrary and capricious.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.