33 C.F.R. § 136.203

Proof

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the requirements of Subparts A and B of this part, a claimant must establish—

(a) That the actions taken were necessary to prevent, minimize, or mitigate the effects of the incident;

(b) That the removal costs were incurred as a result of these actions;

(c) That the actions taken were determined by the FOSC to be consistent with the National Contingency Plan or were directed by the FOSC.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: BP Am. Inc. v. Chustz, 33 F. Supp. 3d 676 (M.D. La. 2014).
BP Am. Inc. v. Chustz, 33 F. Supp. 3d 676 (M.D. La. 2014). “See 33 C.F.R. §§ 136.203 , 136.205. The plaintiffs counter that as a “responsible party,” BP cannot recover any removal costs from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, regardless of the Federal On-Scene Coordinator’s approval or disapproval.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.