34 C.F.R. § 300.42
Supplementary aids and services
Supplementary aids and services means aids, services, and other supports that are provided in regular education classes, other education-related settings, and in extracurricular and nonacademic settings, to enable children with disabilities to be educated with nondisabled children to the maximum extent appropriate in accordance with §§ 300.114 through 300.116.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2021 · leading case: J.A. v. Smith Cnty. Sch. Dist., 364 F. Supp. 3d 803 (M.D. Tenn. 2019).
J.A. v. Smith Cnty. Sch. Dist., 364 F. Supp. 3d 803 (M.D. Tenn. 2019). “" 34 C.F.R. § 300.42 (emphasis added). The preference to mainstream, however, is not absolute.”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12 v. Minnesota Dep't of Educ., 767 N.W.2d 478 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “In 2006, DOE regulations were revised to expand the statutory definition of “supplementary aids and services” as follows: 34 C.F.R. § 300.42 (2008) (emphasis added to indicate new language); cf.”
Elizabeth Tveter v. Pinkerton Academy et al., 2020 DNH 193 (D.N.H. 2020). “§ 1401 (33), with 34 C.F.R. § 300.42 . The definition expressly includes services offered in extracurricular and nonacademic settings, which, in turn, encompass a broad array of activities, including school athletics.”
Oskowis v. Sedona Oak-Creek Unified Sch. Dist. 9 (D. Ariz. 2019). “) This is because “[u]nder 34 C.F.R. § 300.42 , ‘supplementary 12 aids and services’ mean ‘aids, services, and other supports that are provided in regular 13 education classes, other education-related settings, and in extracurricular and nonacademic 14 settings, to enable…”
Tveter v. Derry Coop. Sch. Dist. SAU 10 (D.N.H. 2020). “§ 1401 (33), with 34 C.F.R. § 300.42 . The definition expressly includes services offered in extracurricular and nonacademic settings, which, in turn, encompass a broad array of activities, including school athletics.”
Price v. Commonwealth Charter Academy Cyber Sch. (E.D. Pa. 2021). “]” 34 C.F.R. § 300.42 . Again, it is plain that none of Studevan’s services were provided to T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.