C.F.R. » Title 34 » CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION › PART 668—STUDENT ASSISTANCE GENERAL PROVISIONS › Subpart B—Standards for Participation in Title IV, HEA Programs

34 C.F.R. § 668.15

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: Ass'n of Accredited Cosmetology Schs. v. Lamar Alexander, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Educ., 979 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ass'n of Accredited Cosmetology Schs. v. Lamar Alexander, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Educ., 979 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1992). · cites it 8× “33,-332, 33,338 (1991) (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (f) — (i) (1992)). AACS also challenges the regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.”
Student Loan Servicing All. v. Dist. of Columbia, 351 F. Supp. 3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “416 (a), (b) (incorporating 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 ). There is no indication that Congress, or the DOED for that matter, intended for the prescribed federal minimums to be ceilings.”
New York Inst. of Dietetics, Inc. v. Riley, 966 F. Supp. 1300 (S.D.N.Y. 1997). · cites it 9× “[Plaintiffs] participation in the Title IV Programs under this [Settlement Agreement] does not constitute a finding by the Department that [plaintiff] has met the standards of financial responsibility under 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (b) or (c). 3 The Supplement Agreement obligated the…”
Pro Schs., Inc. v. Riley, 824 F. Supp. 1314 (E.D. Wis. 1993). · cites it 3× “” 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (g)(l)(iii)(B)(5) (emphasis supplied).”
Atlanta Coll. of Med. & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Alexander, 792 F. Supp. 114 (D.D.C. 1992). · cites it 4× “33339 (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (g)(1)(i)(B)). II On July 15, 1991, the Department sent a letter, signed by William L.”
Paul's Beauty Coll. v. United States, 885 F. Supp. 1468 (D. Kan. 1995). · cites it 2× “34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (b)(1). The potential harm to the defendants and the public if the injunction is issued is clear and sizeable.”
Int'l Junior Coll. of Bus. & Tech., Inc. v. Duncan, 802 F.3d 99 (1st Cir. 2015). “, was not involved in this matter, but because the DOE could impose International's liabilities on L'lmage based on the companies’ ownership structure, see 34 C.F.R. §§ 668.15 (c)(2006), 668.174(b)(2002), it was named as a plaintiff in the suit.”
Nat'l Career Coll., Inc. v. Margaret Spellings, 371 F. App'x 794 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “As part of the decision-making process, the DOE considered the forged financial statements that were previously submitted to the DOE on behalf of Computer Business College when Mirzaei was its President and sole owner.”
Ass'n of Accredited Cosmetology Schs. v. Alexander, 774 F. Supp. 655 (D.D.C. 1991). · cites it 2× “” In that view, since the statute is silent as to the appropriate default rate for the years prior to 1991, the Department must look to existing law to determine the thresholds for those three years, that is, to 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (b) (July 1, 1990), which specifies default…”
Armstrong v. Accrediting Council for Continuing Educ. & Training, Inc., 980 F. Supp. 53 (D.D.C. 1997). “Under plaintiffs theory of mistake and illegality, a student could avoid subsequent loan payments if that student could successfully demonstrate to a court of law that the ratio fell below prescribed levels (or the operating deficit rose too high) at the time the student’s loans…”
Bilingual Inst., Inc. v. Riley, 930 F. Supp. 9 (D.D.C. 1996). · cites it 8× “34 C.F.R. §§ 668.15 (f)(7)®, (ii) (1993); see also 34 C.”
Instituto De Educacion Universal Corp. v. Riley, 973 F. Supp. 95 (D.P.R. 1997). “§ 1099c(c), (d) (1992); 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 , 668.16 (1995). IEU charges that the Department did not have any proper factual basis for any of its decisions.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— 34 C.F.R. § 668.15(g)(4) — 1 case
Pro Schs., Inc. v. Riley, 824 F. Supp. 1314 (E.D. Wis. 1993). “” 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (g)(l)(iii)(B)(5) (emphasis supplied).”
— 34 C.F.R. § 668.15(g)(7) — 1 case
Atlanta Coll. of Med. & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Alexander, 792 F. Supp. 114 (D.D.C. 1992). “33339 (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (g)(1)(i)(B)). II On July 15, 1991, the Department sent a letter, signed by William L.”
— 34 C.F.R. § 668.15(h)(l)(i) — 1 case
Atlanta Coll. of Med. & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Alexander, 792 F. Supp. 114 (D.D.C. 1992). “33339 (to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 668.15 (g)(1)(i)(B)). II On July 15, 1991, the Department sent a letter, signed by William L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.