36 C.F.R. § 222.21

Parties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Only the following may be parties to mediation of a term grazing permit dispute:

(a) A mediator authorized to mediate under a State mediation program certified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture;

(b) The Chief, Forest Service, or other Forest Service employee who made the decision being mediated or his or her designee;

(c) The holder whose term grazing permit is the subject of the decision and who has requested mediation in an appeal filed in accordance with the procedures at 36 CFR part 214;

(d) That holder's creditors, if applicable; and

(e) Legal counsel, if retained. The Forest Service will have legal representation in the mediation only if the holder has legal representation in the mediation.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Stout v. U.S. Forest Serv., 869 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Or. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stout v. U.S. Forest Serv., 869 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Or. 2012). · cites it 2× “36 C.F.R. § 222.21 . Claim V asserts that the Forest Service violated the Wild Horses Act by failing to reevaluate the MCWHT’s AML when it issued the 2007 Wild Horse Plan.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.