36 C.F.R. § 261.12

National Forest System roads and trails

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following are prohibited:

(a) Violating the load, weight, height, length, or width limitations prescribed by State law except by special-use authorization or written agreement or by order issued under § 261.54 of this Chapter.

(b) Failing to have a vehicle weighed at a Forest Service weighing station, if required by a sign.

(c) Damaging and leaving in a damaged condition any such road, trail, or segment thereof.

(d) Blocking, restricting, or otherwise interfering with the use of a road, trail, or gate.

(e) Operating a motor vehicle without a valid license as required by State law.

(f) Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or a controlled substance in violation of State law.

(g) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of any State law other than those described in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section.

(h) Operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property.

(i) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of a posted sign or traffic control device.

[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 33520, June 30, 1981; 49 FR 25450, June 21, 1984; 55 FR 25832, June 25, 1990; 89 FR 92816, Nov. 25, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1982–2015 · leading case: United States v. Larry Ventling, 678 F.2d 63 (8th Cir. 1982).
United States v. Larry Ventling, 678 F.2d 63 (8th Cir. 1982). “Facts Larry Ventling was charged with two counts of blocking or interfering with the use of a United States Forest Service Road in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (e). Ven-tling had a non jury trial before a magistrate and was convicted.”
United States v. Rainbow Fam., 695 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Tex. 1988). “14(q) (regulating the disposal of refuse and sewage); 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (d) (prohibiting the restriction of access to Forest System roads); 36 C.”
United States v. Mack, 200 F.3d 653 (9th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2× “10 (a); and (2) impeding a USFS road in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (d). The district court sentenced appellants to 60-days in custody, a $500 fine, and a $20 special assessment fee.”
United States v. Scranton, 25 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (D. Idaho 1997). “§ 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (d). At trial, Forest Service law enforcement officer Peter Deane testified that the Defendant was found perched on top of a tripod structure in the center of Forest Service Road # 9553 on September 24, 1997.”
United States v. Elizabeth O'NaN, 452 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “*282 PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Margaret O’Nan appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s judgment finding O’Nan guilty of violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (d) * , imposing a fíne and restitution, and ordering O’Nan not to interfere with the use of a Forest…”
Smith v. Almida (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “¶21 As they did in the superior court, without elaboration or argument, the Smiths cite 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (d), which prohibits “[b]locking, restricting, or otherwise interfering with the use of a road, trail, or gate.”
United States v. Ganoe, 758 F. Supp. 2d 1052 (E.D. Cal. 2010). “36 C.F.R. § 261.12 The following are prohibited: (a) Violating the load, weight, height, length, or width limitations prescribed by State law except by special-use authorization or written agreement or by order issued under § 261.”
United States v. Rightsell, 40 F. App'x 360 (9th Cir. 2002). “*361 MEMORANDUM ** Andrea Rightsell pleaded guilty to blocking a Forest Service road in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.12 (d) and was sentenced to serve two months in prison followed by two years probation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.