When provided by an order, it is prohibited to go into or be in any area which is closed or restricted for the protection of:
(a) Threatened, endangered, rare, unique, or vanishing species of plants, animals, birds or fish.
(b) Special biological communities.
(c) Objects or areas of historical, archeological, geological, or paleontological interest.
(d) Scientific experiments or investigations.
(e) Public health or safety.
(f) Property.
(g) The privacy of tribal activities for traditional and cultural purposes. Closure to protect the privacy of tribal activities for traditional and cultural purposes must be requested by an Indian tribe; is subject to approval by the Forest Service; shall be temporary; and shall affect the smallest practicable area for the minimum period necessary for activities of the requesting Indian tribe.
[42 FR 2957, Jan. 14, 1977, as amended at 76 FR 3017, Jan. 19, 2011; 89 FR 92816, Nov. 25, 2024]
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Jereb, 882 F.3d 1325 (10th Cir. 2018).
· cites it 2× “§ 551 and 36 C.F.R. 261.53(e)). The case went to trial on April 25, 2016.”
United States v. Fee, 787 F. Supp. 963 (D. Colo. 1992).
· cites it 3× “§ 551 and its implementing regulations, 36 C.F.R. § 261.53 (e) and (f), by entering, on October 24, 1991, an area that was closed to entry pursuant to Special Order # 91-18.”
United States v. Joseph M. Glisson, 105 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 1996).
· cites it 2× “36 CFR 261.53(e). 8 (2) Being in or entering upon lands described as the Cripps Bend Timber Sale which is closed for the purpose of protection of public property.”
United States v. Stubbs, 181 F. App'x 697 (9th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 2× “MEMORANDUM ** Gary Stubbs appeals the district court’s affirmance of his conviction for violating 36 C.F.R. § 261.53 (e) and 36 C.F.R. § 261.”
Wilkins v. United States (D. Mont. 2020).
“Finally, on May 3, 2006, pursuant to 36 C.F.R. 261.53 (which authorizes the Forest Service to enact “special closures” for a variety of reasons including “public health or safety”) the Forest Service temporarily closed the road.”
State of New Mexico v. Dwyer (10th Cir. 1997).
“Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.53 (e) (1978) (still in effect), the agreement authorized Manning to fence and lock the mining site.”
Murphy v. Kenops, 99 F. Supp. 2d 1255 (D. Or. 1999).
“50 and 53 unconstitutional, null and void, and of no effect in that: (1) the “public health and safety” basis for closures found in 36 C.F.R. § 261.53 (e) is standardless and vague, allowing Forest Service officials to close national forests based on their subjective, unbridled…”
— 36 C.F.R. § 261.53(e) — 4 cases
United States v. Jereb, 882 F.3d 1325 (10th Cir. 2018).
“§ 551 and 36 C.F.R. 261.53(e)). The case went to trial on April 25, 2016.”
United States v. Joseph M. Glisson, 105 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 1996).
“36 CFR 261.53(e). 8 (2) Being in or entering upon lands described as the Cripps Bend Timber Sale which is closed for the purpose of protection of public property.”
United States v. Fee, 787 F. Supp. 963 (D. Colo. 1992).
“§ 551 and its implementing regulations, 36 C.F.R. § 261.53 (e) and (f), by entering, on October 24, 1991, an area that was closed to entry pursuant to Special Order # 91-18.”
— 36 C.F.R. § 261.53(f) — 2 cases
United States v. Joseph M. Glisson, 105 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 1996).
“36 CFR 261.53(e). 8 (2) Being in or entering upon lands described as the Cripps Bend Timber Sale which is closed for the purpose of protection of public property.”
United States v. Fee, 787 F. Supp. 963 (D. Colo. 1992).
“§ 551 and its implementing regulations, 36 C.F.R. § 261.53 (e) and (f), by entering, on October 24, 1991, an area that was closed to entry pursuant to Special Order # 91-18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.