37 C.F.R. § 11.505

Unauthorized practice of law

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A practitioner shall not practice law in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction, or assist another in doing so.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: Off. of Lawyer Reg. v. Alan R. Stewart, 2017 WI 106 (Wis. 2017).
Off. of Lawyer Reg. v. Alan R. Stewart, 2017 WI 106 (Wis. 2017). “Attorney Stewart did not respond the OED complaint and was eventually deemed to be in default; the USPTO issued an Initial Decision and Order on Default Judgment on December 16, 2015, finding, inter alia, that Attorney Stewart "violated 37 C.F.R. § 11.505 by continuing to…”
Piccone v. Pato (Fed. Cir. 2019). · cites it 2× “Piccone violated the prohibi- tion against unauthorized practice of law, as set out in 37 C.F.R. § 11.505 , when he prepared a Response to Office Action on Behalf of Lawless America Association (Lawless) during the prosecution of a trademark application.”
In the Matter of Correll (Mass. 2024). “111 ; engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by practicing law "in a jurisdiction in violation of the regulation of the legal profession in that jurisdiction," in violation of 37 C.F.R. § 11.505 ; and engaged in "conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of…”
Koji IP, LLC v. Renesas Elec. Am., Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2024). “” 37 C.F.R. § 11.505 . A registered 26 patent attorney is subject to discipline for “professional misconduct” by the USPTO where 27 misconduct includes being “publicly disciplined on ethical or professional misconduct grounds by 1 As discussed herein, these attorneys are ORDERED…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.