C.F.R. » Title 37 » CHAPTER III—COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS › SUBCHAPTER B—COPYRIGHT ROYALTY JUDGES RULES AND PROCEDURES › PART 351—PROCEEDINGS

37 C.F.R. § 351.14

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any party to the proceeding may file proposed findings of fact and conclusions, briefs or memoranda of law, or may be directed by the Copyright Royalty Judges to do so. Such filings, and any replies to them, shall take place after the record has been closed.

(b) Failure to file when directed to do so shall be considered a waiver of the right to participate further in the proceeding unless good cause for the failure is shown. A party waives any objection to a provision in the determination unless the provision conflicts with a proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law filed by the party.

(c) Proposed findings of fact shall be numbered by paragraph and include all basic evidentiary facts developed on the record used to support proposed conclusions, and shall contain appropriate citations to the record for each evidentiary fact. Proposed conclusions shall be stated and numbered by paragraph separately. Failure to comply with this paragraph (c) may result in the offending paragraph being stricken.

[71 FR 53330, Sept. 11, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2009–2020 · leading case: Intercollegiate Broadcast Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 574 F.3d 748 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Intercollegiate Broadcast Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 574 F.3d 748 (D.C. Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “See 37 C.F.R. § 351.14 (b) (“A party waives any objection to a provision in the determination unless the provision conflicts with a proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law filed by the party.”
Intercollegiate Broadcast Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 571 F.3d 69 (D.C. Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “See 37 C.F.R. § 351.14 (b) (“A party waives any objection to a provision in the determination unless the provision conflicts with a proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law filed by the party.”
SoundExchange, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 904 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “" 37 C.F.R. § 351.14 (b). As a result, an argument presented to the Board for the first time at rehearing is considered forfeited.”
George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “See 37 C.F.R. § 351.14 (b) (“A party waives any objection to a provision in the determination unless the provision conflicts with a proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law filed by the party.”
George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “See 37 C.F.R. § 351.14 (b) (“A party waives any objection to a provision in the determination unless the provision conflicts with a proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law filed by the party.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.