38 C.F.R. § 17.54
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: Zimick v. West, 11 Vet. App. 45 (Vet. App. 1998).
Zimick v. West, 11 Vet. App. 45 (Vet. App. 1998). “See 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 . Moreover, the Secretary has interpreted § 1703 to allow for “individual authorizations” as well as contracts with non-VA facilities.”
Tellex v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 233 (Vet. App. 2001). “” Ibid, (citing 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 (a) (2000)); Malone v. Gober, 10 Vet.”
Malone v. Gober, 10 Vet. App. 539 (Vet. App. 1997). “38 C.F.R. § 17.54 (1996) (formerly 38 C.F.”
Homero Cantu v. Anthony J. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 92 (Vet. App. 2004). “Moreover, he argues that VA authorized his admission to the non-VA facility at VA expense as is required by 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 (a). Br. at 19-20. Finally, the appellant argues that, if the Court does not reverse the Board’s findings, the matter should be remanded for compliance…”
13-34 216 (Board of Vet. App. 2016). “§ 1703 (a); 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 ; see also Malone v. Gober, 10 Vet.”
210401-185501 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “§ 1703 ; 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 . In the case of an emergency, an authorization may be deemed a prior authorization if an application is made within 72 hours after the hour of admission.”
10-22 714 (Board of Vet. App. 2015). “§§ 1725 , 1728 (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. §§ 17.54 , 17.120, 17.***********-17.”
07-24 090 (Board of Vet. App. 2010). “2009); 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 (2009). 2. The criteria for payment or reimbursement for medical services provided by Halifax Hospital on April 14, 2006, under 38 U.”
Kavanaugh v. Peake, 273 F. App'x 937 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “” One such regulation — 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 — requires prior authorization for treatment at a non-VA hospital pursuant to § 1703(a): The admission of a veteran to a non-Department of Veterans Affairs hospital at Department of Veterans Affairs expense must be authorized in advance.”
12-11 320 (Board of Vet. App. 2014). “§ 1703 (a); 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 . The Veteran has not alleged, and the evidence does not show, that she actually sought and received prior authorization from VA for the treatment she received on January 13 and 14, 2012, at Shands, nor was an application for authorization made to…”
08-03 534 (Board of Vet. App. 2011). “See 38 C.F.R. § 17.54 (2010). Here, the Veteran's treatment at the non-VA facility was not authorized in advance as there is no indication that VA authorization was obtained prior to this particular admission, or within 72 hours thereafter, for the medical services provided to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.