38 C.F.R. § 3.15
Computation of service
For nonservice-connected or service-connected benefits, active service is countable exclusive of time spent on an industrial, agricultural, or indefinite furlough, time lost on absence without leave (without pay), under arrest (without acquittal), in desertion, while undergoing sentence of court-martial or a period following release from active duty under the circumstances outlined in § 3.41. In claims based on Spanish-American War service, leave authorized under General Order No. 130, War Department, is included.
Duty periods. See § 3.6(b)(6).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2021 · leading case: Kisor v. Shulkin, 869 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2017).
Kisor v. Shulkin, 869 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2017). “There is no dispute that the personnel records at issue in this case are “service records" within the meaning of 38 C.F.R. § 3.15 6(c)( 1 )(i). ' 10 . The Board interpreted 38 C.”
Clarence W. King v. Eric K. Shinseki, 26 Vet. App. 484 (Vet. App. 2014). “]” 38 C.F.R. § 3.15 (2013). In this case, there is no dispute that the time between the appellant’s entry into military service and discharge from military service was greater than 90 days and occurred during a period of war.”
14-12 571 (Board of Vet. App. 2018). “38 C.F.R. § 3.15 (c)(4). In this case, VA has fulfilled its duty to assist the Veteran in making reasonable efforts to identify and obtain relevant records in support of the issue on appeal.”
200610-90481 (Board of Vet. App. 2021). “38 C.F.R. § 3.15 , 4.115a, 4.115b, DC 7528.”
12-13 069 (Board of Vet. App. 2014). “§ 5108 ; 38 C.F.R. § 3.15 (a). The reopened claim is addressed further in the remand section.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.