C.F.R. » Title 4 » CHAPTER I—GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE › SUBCHAPTER B—GENERAL PROCEDURES › PART 28—GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD; PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO CLAIMS CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AT THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE › Subpart D—Special Procedures; Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Cases

4 C.F.R. § 28.100

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1994 · leading case: A. Eugene RAMEY, Appellant, v. Charles A. BOWSHER, Comptroller Gen. of the United States, Appellee, 9 F.3d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
A. Eugene RAMEY, Appellant, v. Charles A. BOWSHER, Comptroller Gen. of the United States, Appellee, 9 F.3d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “4 C.F.R. § 28.100 (e). 1 Ramey says this odd result is caused by 31 U.”
Chennareddy v. Bowsher, 935 F.2d 315 (D.C. Cir. 1991). · cites it 7× “51 (c) from subsequent PAB rules and replaced the regulation with a new provision codified at 4 C.F.R. § 28.100 . 3 GAO insists that “the regulations cited were not in force during the time appellant filed his charges of age discrimination with GAO or with the PAB, or when he…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.