40 C.F.R. § 144.37

Continuation of expiring permits

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) EPA permits. When EPA is the permit-issuing authority, the conditions of an expired permit continue in force under 5 U.S.C. 558(c) until the effective date of a new permit if:

(1) The permittee has submitted a timely application which is a complete application for a new permit; and

(2) The Regional Administrator, through no fault of the permittee does not issue a new permit with an effective date on or before the expiration date of the previous permit (for example, when issuance is impracticable due to time or resource constraints).

(b) Effect. Permits continued under this section remain fully effective and enforceable.

(c) Enforcement. When the permittee is not in compliance with the conditions of the expiring or expired permit the Regional Administrator may choose to do any or all of the following:

(1) Initiate enforcement action based upon the permit which has been continued;

(2) Issue a notice of intent to deny the new permit. If the permit is denied, the owner or operator would then be required to cease the activities authorized by the continued permit or be subject to enforcement action for operating without a permit;

(3) Issue a new permit under part 124 with appropriate conditions; or

(4) Take other actions authorized by these regulations.

(d) State continuation. An EPA issued permit does not continue in force beyond its time expiration date under Federal law if at that time a State is the permitting authority. A State authorized to administer the UIC program may continue either EPA or State-issued permits until the effective date of the new permits, if State law allows. Otherwise, the facility or activity is operating without a permit from the time of expiration of the old permit to the effective date of the State-issued new permit.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–1995 · leading case: Legal Assistance v. Bd. of Brevard Cty., 642 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1994).
Legal Assistance v. Bd. of Brevard Cty., 642 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 1994). “40 C.F.R. § 144.37 (d) (1993). Therefore, upon application for a new permit, the State may continue a previously issued permit until the effective date of the new permit if "State law allows.”
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 829 F. Supp. 1023 (N.D. Ind. 1993). · cites it 2× “40 C.F.R. § 144.37 (a). The Defendant has submitted a timely application, however, the EPA has not yet issued or denied a new permit to the Defendant.”
Legal Env't Assistance Found., Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Brevard Cnty., Florida, 10 F.3d 1579 (11th Cir. 1994). · cites it 3× “40 C.F.R. § 144.37 (d) (1992) (emphasis added).”
Legal Env't Assistance Found., Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Brevard Cnty., Florida, 61 F.3d 25 (11th Cir. 1995). · cites it 2× “1 The Board argues that the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (“FDER”) properly granted the Board a continuance of its construction and testing permit, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 144.37 (d) (1992) 2 , and that the continued permit allows for limited operation of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.