40 C.F.R. § 255.33
Inclusion of Federal facilities and Native American Reservations
Major Federal facilities and Native American Reservations should be treated for the purposes of these guidelines as though they are incorporated municipalities, and the facility director or administrator should be considered the same as a locally elected official.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1987–2004 · leading case: Solano Garbage Co. v. Cheney, 779 F. Supp. 477 (E.D. Cal. 1991).
Solano Garbage Co. v. Cheney, 779 F. Supp. 477 (E.D. Cal. 1991). “The court found that 40 C.F.R. § 255.33 “represents an appropriate exercise by EPA of its statutory mandate to promulgate guidelines” and that those guidelines were part of the mandated California state plan.”
Blue Legs v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 668 F. Supp. 1329 (D.S.D. 1987). “40 C.F.R. § 255.33 . The guidelines referred to are those in 40 C.”
Waste Mgmt. of North Am., Inc. v. Weinberger, 862 F.2d 1393 (9th Cir. 1988). “40 C.F.R. § 255.33 (1987). As a municipality, the Base, under California law, would be entitled to determine its own means of waste collection and disposal.”
Blue Dot Energy Co. v. United States, 76 Fed. Cl. 783 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “B-279250, 98-1 CPD ¶142, 1998 WL 267083 (May 26, 1998), the GAO held in that case only that 40 C.F.R. § 255.33 does not exempt a federal agency from the requirement that federal installations and agencies comply with local solid waste management regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.