40 C.F.R. § 264.111
Closure performance standard
The owner or operator must close the facility in a manner that:
(a) Minimizes the need for further maintenance; and
(b) Controls, minimizes or eliminates, to the extent necessary to protect human health and the environment, post-closure escape of hazardous waste, hazardous constituents, leachate, contaminated run-off, or hazardous waste decomposition products to the ground or surface waters or to the atmosphere; and
(c) Complies with the closure requirements of this part, including, but not limited to, the requirements of §§ 264.178, 264.197, 264.228, 264.258, 264.280, 264.310, 264.351, 264.601 through 264.603, and 264.1102.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–2003 · leading case: United States v. Ottati & Goss, 694 F. Supp. 977 (D.N.H. 1988).
United States v. Ottati & Goss, 694 F. Supp. 977 (D.N.H. 1988). “47923; 40 C.F. R. §§ 264.111, 264.112. In addition to meeting ARARS, Section 121(b) requires that EPA select a remedy that utilizes permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies or resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent practicable.”
California v. M & P INVESTMENTS, 308 F. Supp. 2d 1137 (E.D. Cal. 2003). “100 ); and (4) failure to appropriately close the facility ( 40 C.F.R. § 264.111 ). (Guild’s Opp. to Summ.”
Opinion No. (1983) (Mo. Att'y Gen. 1983). “011 (9)(A)2, which is equivalent to 40 CFR 264.111 , the word "by" was erroneously placed between "environment" and "the" in the fifth line of the paragraph.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.