40 C.F.R. § 35.2108

Phased or segmented treatment works

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Grant funding may be awarded for a phase or segment of a treatment works, subject to the limitations of § 35.2123, although that phase or segment does not result in compliance with the enforceable requirements of the Act, provided:

(a) The grant agreement requires the recipient to make the treatment works of which the phase or segment is a part operational and comply with the enforceable requirements of the Act according to a schedule specified in the grant agreement regardless of whether grant funding is available for the remaining phases and segments; and

(b) Except in the case of a grant solely for the acquisition of eligible real property, one or more of the following conditions exist:

(1) The Federal share of the cost of building the treatment works would require a disproportionate share of the State's annual allotment relative to other needs or would require a major portion of the State's annual allotment;

(2) The period to complete the building of the treatment works will cover three years or more;

(3) The treatment works must be phased or segmented to meet the requirements of a Federal or State court order; or

(4) The treatment works is being phased or segmented to build only the less-than-secondary facility pending a final decision on the applicant's request for a secondary treatment requirement waiver under section 301(h) of the Act.

[49 FR 6234, Feb. 17, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 45895, Nov. 4, 1985]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1984 · leading case: Allegheny Cnty. Sanitary Auth. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 732 F.2d 1167 (3rd Cir. 1984).
Allegheny Cnty. Sanitary Auth. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 732 F.2d 1167 (3rd Cir. 1984). “See 40 C.F.R. § 35.2108 (a) (1983). In this instance, also, no public hearings were held.”
Town of Orangetown v. Ruckelshaus, 579 F. Supp. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “See 40 C.F.R. § 35.2108 . IV. Attorney’s Fees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.