40 C.F.R. § 419.20
Applicability; description of the cracking subcategory
The provisions of this subpart are applicable to all discharges from any facility that produces petroleum products by the use of topping and cracking, whether or not the facility includes any process in addition to topping and cracking. The provisions of this subpart are not applicable, however, to facilities that include the processes specified in subparts C, D, or E of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1979–1979 · leading case: Shell Oil Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency Andthe United States Env't Prot. Agency, 595 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1979).
Shell Oil Co. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Adm'r, U. S. Env't Prot. Agency Andthe United States Env't Prot. Agency, 595 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1979). “40 C.F.R. § 419.20 . 8 . According to Shell, the Norco refinery effluent limit would be increased 16 percent if the olefins plant processes are considered to be thermal cracking accorded a weighting factor of + 6 rather than petrochemical processes accorded a weighting factor of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.