C.F.R. » Title 40 » CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY › SUBCHAPTER N—EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS › PART 432—MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY › Subpart G—Sausage and Luncheon Meats Processors

40 C.F.R. § 432.72

Effluent limitations attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently available (BPT)

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the following effluent limitations representing the application of BPT:

(a) Facilities that generate no more than 50 million pounds per year of finished products must achieve the following effluent limitations:

Effluent Limitations

[BPT]

Regulated
parameter		Maximum daily 1Maximum monthly avg. 1
BOD50.560.28
Fecal Coliform(2)(3)
O&G 40.200.10
TSS0.680.34
1 Pounds per 1000 lbs (or g/kg) of finished product.
2 Maximum of 400 MPN or CFU per 100 mL at any time.
3 No maximum monthly average limitation.
4 May be measured as hexane extractable material (HEM).

(b) Facilities that generate more than 50 million pounds per year of finished products must achieve the limitations for BOD5, fecal coliform, O&G, and TSS specified in paragraph (a) of this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Citizens Coal Council & Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 447 F.3d 879 (6th Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Citizens Coal Council & Kentucky Resources Council, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 447 F.3d 879 (6th Cir. 2006). “” 40 C.F.R. § 432.72 (b)(1). And, there is even an exception to this toothless standard if the EPA determines that measuring baseline loadings is “infeasible.”
Citizens Coal v. EPA (6th Cir. 2006). “” 40 C.F.R. § 432.72 (b)(1). And, there is even an exception to this toothless standard if the EPA determines that measuring baseline loadings is “infeasible.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.