40 C.F.R. § 7.30
General prohibition
No person shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving EPA assistance on the basis of race, color, national origin, or on the basis of sex in any program or activity receiving EPA assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, including the Environmental Financing Act of 1972.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2001–2003 · leading case: South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 145 F. Supp. 2d 505 (D.N.J. 2001).
South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 145 F. Supp. 2d 505 (D.N.J. 2001). “” 40 C.F.R. § 7.30 . Furthermore, the regulations specifically and unambiguously prohibit disparate impact discrimination.”
South Camden Citizens in Action v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 145 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D.N.J. 2001). “” 40 C.F.R. § 7.30 . The first section under Subpart B is a general prohibition which explicitly forbids any “program or activity” which receives “EPA assistance” from excluding from participation in, denying the benefits of, or subjecting to discrimination any person on the…”
Franks v. Ross, 293 F. Supp. 2d 599 (E.D.N.C. 2003). “Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants are subject to implementing regulations 40 C.F.R. §§ 7.30 and 7.35; 24 C.F.R. § 1.”
South Camden Citizens v. New Jersey Dep't of Env't Prot., 274 F.3d 771 (3rd Cir. 2001). “*781 40 C.F.R. §§ 7.30 & 7.35(b). According to plaintiffs, these statutory provisions and their complementary regulations prohibiting discriminatory impacts in administering programs create a federal right enforceable through section 1983.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.