41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2
Administrative responsibility
The Director has been delegated authority and assigned responsibility for carrying out the responsibilities assigned to the Secretary under the Executive order. All correspondence regarding the order should be directed to the Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Employment Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: Milton UTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VARIAN Assocs., INC., Defendant-Appellee, 811 F.2d 1279 (9th Cir. 1987).
Milton UTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VARIAN Assocs., INC., Defendant-Appellee, 811 F.2d 1279 (9th Cir. 1987). “§ 401 (permitting delegation of Secretary’s duties), to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 . The OFCCP monitors program compliance through compliance reviews and investigation of employee complaints.”
Gulf Oil Corp. v. William Brock, United States Sec'y of Labor, 778 F.2d 834 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 (1985). At the time this suit was brought, the Department of the Interior served as Gulfs compliance agency.”
Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 412 F. Supp. 171 (D. Del. 1976). “11246, § 203; 41 C.F.R.,§§ 60-1.2 and 60-1.6. Failure of a government contractor to comply with the Executive Order and the regulations can result in the cancellation of existing contracts and debarment of the contractor from future contract awards.”
['associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Shiu'], 30 F. Supp. 3d 25 (D.D.C. 2014). “17, 1974); 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 . 2 . The Court must address this issue even ■ though the defendants did not raise it in their briefs.”
Carroll v. Off. of Fed. Contract Compliance Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 235 F. Supp. 3d 79 (D.D.C. 2017). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 . These regulations provide that when OFCCP has reasonable cause to believe that a federal contractor has violated the Executive Order, OFCCP “may issue a notice requiring the contractor to show cause” why enforcement proceedings are not warranted.”
Nat'l Org. for Women v. Soc. Sec. Admin. of the Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 736 F.2d 727 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 (1983). . Contract-compliance authority has since been consolidated in OFCCP.”
United Tech. Corp. v. Marshall, 464 F. Supp. 845 (D. Conn. 1979). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 . In order to insure lawful compliance with the goals of the Executive Order, government contractors are required to prepare and to file with the OFCC an annual Employer Information Report, known as an EEO-1 report.”
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Rumsfeld, 417 F. Supp. 365 (E.D. Va. 1976). “11246, § 202, § 401; 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 . 2 . “An acceptable affirmative program must include an analysis of areas within which the contractor is deficient in the utilization of minority groups and women and further, goals and timetables to which the contractor’s good faith…”
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Marshall, 441 F. Supp. 1110 (E.D. La. 1977). “Except for his regulations-making power, the Secretary of Labor has assigned responsibility for enforcement of the Executive Order to the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) [41 CFR 60-1.”
Traylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 402 F. Supp. 871 (N.D. Cal. 1975). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 . 10 . See, e. g., Baer v.”
Legal Aid Soc'y of Alameda Cnty. v. Brennan, 381 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Cal. 1974). “Fifteen federal agencies including the USDA have been designated as “compliance agencies” by the OFCC and assigned compliance responsibilities under Executive Order 11246 for specific industries according to the categories of the Standard Industrial Code.”
United Space All., LLC v. Solis, 824 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2011). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.2 ; see also 74 Fed.Reg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.