C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › PART 431—STATE ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › Subpart F—Safeguarding Information on Applicants and Beneficiaries

42 C.F.R. § 431.301

State plan requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A State plan must provide, under a State statute that imposes legal sanctions, safeguards meeting the requirements of this subpart that restrict the use or disclosure of information concerning applicants and beneficiaries to purposes directly connected with the administration of the plan.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner (2019) ariz “301"> 42 C.F.R. § 431.301 , those purposes include "[c]onducting or assisting an investigation, prosecution, or civil or criminal proceeding related to the administration of the plan," <extracted-citation index="19" url="https://cite.”
In Re Grand Jury Investigation (1982) ri “” 42 C.F.R. § 431.301 . This requirement was enacted to safeguard a patient’s privacy rights while ensuring that privacy interests do not impede the administration of the plan.”
Parents United for Better Schools, Inc. v. School District of Philadelphia Board of Education (1997) paed “See also 42 C.F.R. §§ 431.301 , 431.305(b), 440.”
Dorosh v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Commissioner (2023) mnd “42 CFR 431.301(c)(1)(vi)-1915(i), HCBS 42 CFR 441.”
Worthen v. Gaulin (2005) vtsuperct “…with the administra-tion of [the state plan for administering federal aid].” 42 C.F.R. § 431.301 (2004). State agencies “must have criteria that govern the types of information about applicants and recipients that are safeguarded.” Id. § 431.305(”
ASSOC. FOR RET. CITIZENS/OUACHITA v. Wilson (2008) lactapp “42 C.F.R. § 431.301 . The Medicaid agency is charged with the authority to implement and enforce the provisions specified for safeguarding the protected information.”
— 42 C.F.R. § 431.301(c)(1)(vi) — 1 case
Dorosh v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Commissioner (2023) mnd “42 CFR 431.301(c)(1)(vi)-1915(i), HCBS 42 CFR 441.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.