C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER G—STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION › PART 485—CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION: SPECIALIZED PROVIDERS › Subpart F—Conditions of Participation: Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs)

42 C.F.R. § 485.608

Condition of participation: Compliance with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The CAH and its staff are in compliance with applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations.

(a) Standard: Compliance with Federal laws and regulations. The CAH is in compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations related to the health and safety of patients.

(b) Standard: Compliance with State and local laws and regulations. All patient care services are furnished in accordance with applicable State and local laws and regulations.

(c) Standard: Licensure of CAH. The CAH is licensed in accordance with applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations.

(d) Standard: Licensure, certification or registration of personnel. Staff of the CAH are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations.

[58 FR 30671, May 26, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 46037, Aug. 29, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case: United States of Am. ex rel Tali Arik, M.D. v. DVH Hosp. All., LLC, Inc. (D. Nev. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States of Am. ex rel Tali Arik, M.D. v. DVH Hosp. All., LLC, Inc. (D. Nev. 2020). “20 29 42 C.F.R §§ 485.608, 485.620(a), 485.635(c)(1)(ii).”
United States of Am. ex rel Tali Arik, M.D. v. DVH Hosp. All., LLC, Inc. (D. Nev. 2024). “62 42 C.F.R §§ 485.608, 485.620(a), 485.635(c)(1)(ii).”
St. Helena Clear Lake Hosp. v. Xavier Becerra, 30 F.4th 301 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “42 C.F.R. § 485.608 . And it asserts California law requires all hospitals to provide various specialty services, particularly surgery.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.