42 C.F.R. § 488.417

Denial of payment for all new admissions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Optional denial of payment. Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, CMS or the State may deny payment for all new admissions when a facility is not in substantial compliance with the requirements, as defined in § 488.401, as follows:

(1) Medicare facilities. In the case of Medicare facilities, CMS may deny payment to the facility.

(2) Medicaid facilities. In the case of Medicaid facilities—

(i) The State may deny payment to the facility; and

(ii) CMS may deny payment to the State for all new Medicaid admissions to the facility.

(b) Required denial of payment. CMS does or the State must deny payment for all new admissions when—

(1) The facility is not in substantial compliance, as defined in § 488.401, 3 months after the last day of the survey identifying the noncompliance; or

(2) The State survey agency has cited a facility with substandard quality of care on the last three consecutive standard surveys.

(c) Resumption of payments: Repeated instances of substandard quality of care. When a facility has repeated instances of substandard quality of care, payments to the facility or, under Medicaid, CMS payments to the State on behalf of the facility, resume on the date that—

(1) The facility achieves substantial compliance as indicated by a revisit or written credible evidence acceptable to CMS (for all facilities except non-State operated NFs against which CMS is imposing no remedies) or the State (for non-State operated NFs against which CMS is imposing no remedies); and

(2) CMS (for all facilities except non-State operated NFs against which CMS is imposing no remedies) or the State (for non-State operated NFs against which CMS is imposing no remedies) believes that the facility is capable of remaining in substantial compliance.

(d) Resumption of payments: No repeated instances of substandard quality of care. When a facility does not have repeated instances of substandard quality of care, payments to the facility or, under Medicaid, CMS payments to the State on behalf of the facility, resume prospectively on the date that the facility achieves substantial compliance, as indicated by a revisit or written credible evidence acceptable to CMS (under Medicare) or the State (under Medicaid).

(e) Restriction. No payments to a facility or, under Medicaid, CMS payments to the State on behalf of the facility, are made for the period between the date that the—

(1) Denial of payment remedy is imposed; and

(2) Facility achieves substantial compliance, as determined by CMS or the State.

[59 FR 56243, Nov. 10, 1994; 60 FR 50119, Sept. 28, 1995]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Meridian L.P. v. Thompson, 305 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D.D.C. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Meridian L.P. v. Thompson, 305 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D.D.C. 2004). · cites it 2× “§ 1395i-3(h)(2)(D); 42 C.F.R. § 488.417 (b)(1). Upon imposition of a DPNA, Medicare will not reimburse a healthcare provider for newly admitted patients until the DPNA is terminated.”

Elevate Care Country Club Hills, LLC v. Kennedy, Sec'y of United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., in his Off. capacity (N.D. Ill. 2025). “42 C.F.R. §§ 488.417 , 488.440(b). When CMS imposes an enforcement remedy against a facility that has failed to substantially comply with a Medicare requirement, the facility may request a formal evidentiary hearing before an administrative law judge to contest its deficiency…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.