43 C.F.R. § 4.1270

Petition for discretionary review of a proposed civil penalty

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any party may petition the Board to review an order or decision by an administrative law judge disposing of a civil penalty proceeding under § 4.1150.

(b) A petition under this section shall be filed on or before 30 days from the date of receipt of the order or decision sought to be reviewed and the time for filing may not be extended.

(c) A petitioner under this section shall list the alleged errors of the administrative law judge and shall attach a copy of the order or decision sought to be reviewed.

(d) Any party may file with the Board a response to the petition for review within 10 days of receipt of a copy of such petition.

(e) Not later than 30 days from the filing of a petition under this section, the Board shall grant or deny the petition in whole or in part.

(f) If the petition is granted, the rules in §§ 4.1273 through 4.1275 are applicable, and the Board must use the point system and conversion table contained in 30 CFR part 723 or 845 in recalculating assessments. However, the Board has the same authority to waive the civil penalty formula as that granted to administrative law judges in § 4.1157(b)(1). If the petition is denied, the decision of the administrative law judge is final for the Department, subject to § 4.5.

[43 FR 34386, Aug. 3, 1978, as amended at 67 FR 61511, Oct. 1, 2002; 75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1982–1983 · leading case: John Walters Coal Co. v. Watt, 553 F. Supp. 838 (E.D. Ky. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

John Walters Coal Co. v. Watt, 553 F. Supp. 838 (E.D. Ky. 1982). · cites it 2× “On July 17, 1981, the plaintiff filed petitions for discretionary review of the orders of dismissal, pursuant to 43 CFR § 4.1270 . These petitions were denied on August 5 and 18, 1981.”

Blackhawk Mining Co., Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y, Dep't of the Interior & United States of Am., 711 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1983). “43 C.F.R. § 4.1270 ; 30 U.S.C. § 1276 (a).”

B & M Coal Corp., Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Off. of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enf't, Counter-Claimant-Appellee, 699 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1983). “§ 1275 (c); 43 C.F.R. §§ 4.1270 et seq. The Secretary’s regulations also authorize appeals to an administrative review board and, ultimately, the statute grants access to judicial review.”

United States v. Hill, 533 F. Supp. 810 (E.D. Tenn. 1982). “43 C.F.R. § 4.1270 ; 30 U.S.C. § 1276 (a)(2).”

United States v. Log Mountain Mining Co., 550 F. Supp. 811 (E.D. Tenn. 1982). “43 C.F.R. § 4.1270 ; 30 U.S.C. § 1276 (a)(2).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.