43 C.F.R. § 4.1286

Motion for a hearing on an appeal involving issues of fact

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any party may file a motion that the Board refer a case to an administrative law judge for a hearing. The motion must state:

(1) What specific issues of material fact require a hearing;

(2) What evidence concerning these issues must be presented by oral testimony, or be subject to cross-examination;

(3) What witnesses need to be examined; and

(4) What documentary evidence requires explanation, if any.

(b) In response to a motion under paragraph (a) of this section or on its own initiative, the Board may order a hearing if there are:

(1) Any issues of material fact which, if proved, would alter the disposition of the appeal; or

(2) Significant factual or legal issues remaining to be decided and the record without a hearing would be insufficient for resolving them.

(c) If the Board orders a hearing, it must:

(1) Specify the issues of fact upon which the hearing is to be held; and

(2) Request the administrative law judge to issue:

(i) Proposed findings of fact on the issues presented at the hearing;

(ii) A recommended decision that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law; or

(iii) A decision that will be final for the Department unless a notice of appeal is filed.

(d) If the Board orders a hearing, it may do one or more of the following:

(1) Suspend the effectiveness of the decision under review pending a final Departmental decision on the appeal if it finds good cause to do so;

(2) Authorize the administrative law judge to specify additional issues; or

(3) Authorize the parties to agree to additional issues that are material, with the approval of the administrative law judge.

(e) The hearing will be conducted under §§ 4.1100, 4.1102 through 4.1115, and 4.1120 through 4.1122. Unless the Board orders otherwise, the administrative law judge may consider other relevant issues and evidence identified after referral of the case for a hearing.

[75 FR 64669, Oct. 20, 2010, as amended at 90 FR 2430, Jan. 10, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1997 · leading case: Cumberland Reclamation Co. v. Sec'y, United States Dep't of the Interior, 925 F.2d 164 (6th Cir. 1991).
Cumberland Reclamation Co. v. Sec'y, United States Dep't of the Interior, 925 F.2d 164 (6th Cir. 1991). “43 C.F.R. § 4.1286 (b) (1989) (“The allowance of a request for a hearing is within the discretion of the Board[.”
Catron v. Babbitt, 955 F. Supp. 627 (W.D. Va. 1997). “43 C.F.R. § 4.1286 (a) provides that “[a]ny party may request the Board to order a hearing before an administrative law judge .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.