C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER D—RANGE MANAGEMENT (4000) Group 4100—Grazing Administration › PART 4100—GRAZING ADMINISTRATION—EXCLUSIVE OF ALASKA › Subpart 4120—Grazing Management

43 C.F.R. § 4120.3-9

Water rights for the purpose of livestock grazing on public lands

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any right that the United States acquires to use water on public land for the purpose of livestock watering on public land will be acquired, perfected, maintained, and administered under the substantive and procedural laws of the state within which such land is located.

[71 FR 39505, July 12, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2001–2011 · leading case: United States v. State Eng'r, 27 P.3d 51 (Nev. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. State Eng'r, 27 P.3d 51 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 6× “[3] Eventually, the BLM published a proposed regulation, later codified at 43 C.F.R. § 4120.3-9 (1995), which contained the following water rights provision: Any right acquired on or after August 21, 1995, to use water on public land for the purpose of livestock watering on…”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Kraayenbrink, 632 F.3d 472 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “43 C.F.R. § 4120.3-9 (1995). Under the 2006 Regulations, to the extent permitted by state law, permittees, not the United States, acquire and hold water rights on public lands.”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Kraayenbrink, 620 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “43 C.F.R. § 4120.3-9 (1995). Under the 2006 Regulations, to the extent permitted by state law, permittees, not the United States, acquire and hold water rights on public lands.”
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Kraayenbrink, 632 F.3d 472 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 3× “43 C.F.R. § 4120.3-9 (1995). Under the 2006 Regulations, to the extent permitted by state law, permittees, not the United States, acquire and hold water rights on public lands.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.