C.F.R. » Title 43 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER D—RANGE MANAGEMENT (4000) Group 4100—Grazing Administration › PART 4100—GRAZING ADMINISTRATION—EXCLUSIVE OF ALASKA › Subpart 4160—Administrative Remedies

43 C.F.R. § 4160.2

Protests

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any applicant, permittee, lessee or other interested public may protest the proposed decision under § 4160.1 of this title in person or in writing to the authorized officer within 15 days after receipt of such decision.

[47 FR 41713, Sept. 21, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 6455, Feb. 21, 1984; 61 FR 4227, Feb. 5, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2010 · leading case: W. Watersheds Proj. v. Interior Bd. of Land Appeals, 624 F.3d 983 (9th Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
W. Watersheds Proj. v. Interior Bd. of Land Appeals, 624 F.3d 983 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “43 C.F.R. § 4160.2 . Absent a protest and reconsideration, the proposed decision becomes a Final Grazing Decision, which an interested party may then appeal.”
Luther Wallace Klump v. United States of Am. Bruce Babbitt, Sec'y of the Interior, 43 F.3d 1479 (9th Cir. 1994). “Nonetheless, he signed the permit and chose not to bring a formal protest, even though the BLM explicitly offered him the opportunity pursuant to 43 C.F.R. 4160.2. Instead, Klump disregarded the restrictions and intentionally allowed his cattle to graze in the protected areas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.