45 C.F.R. § 160.512

Prehearing conferences

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The ALJ must schedule at least one prehearing conference, and may schedule additional prehearing conferences as appropriate, upon reasonable notice, which may not be less than 14 business days, to the parties.

(b) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following—

(1) Simplification of the issues;

(2) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;

(3) Stipulations and admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;

(4) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;

(5) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of the other party) and written argument;

(6) Limitation of the number of witnesses;

(7) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;

(8) Discovery of documents as permitted by this subpart;

(9) The time and place for the hearing;

(10) The potential for the settlement of the case by the parties; and

(11) Other matters as may tend to encourage the fair, just and expeditious disposition of the proceedings, including the protection of privacy of individually identifiable health information that may be submitted into evidence or otherwise used in the proceeding, if appropriate.

(c) The ALJ must issue an order containing the matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2021 · leading case: Lewis v. Johnson & Wales Univ. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2021).
Lewis v. Johnson & Wales Univ. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2021). · cites it 3× “45 C.F.R. § 160.512 (e)(1). Contrary to Debtor’s suggestion, the Privacy Rule does not require a qualified protective order.”
Kerr v. Wenatchee Valley Med. Grp. (E.D. Wash. 2020). “In accordance with the Health Insurance Portability 11 and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), 45 C.F.R. § 160.512 (e), it is hereby 12 stipulated and agreed by and between the respective parties hereto and Ordered by 13 the Court that WVMG and Confluence Health (collectively,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.