C.F.R. » Title 45 » CHAPTER XVI—LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION › PART 1610—USE OF NON-LSC FUNDS; PROGRAM INTEGRITY › Subpart B—Use of Non-LSC Funds

45 C.F.R. § 1610.4

Prohibitions on the use of non-LSC funds

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Non-LSC funds. Non-LSC funds may not be used by recipients for restricted activities as described in this section, subject to the exceptions in §§ 1610.5 and 1610.6 of this part.

(b) Extended restrictions. The extended restrictions apply to the following uses of non-LSC funds:

(1) Private funds—any use of private funds;

(2) Public funds—any use of public funds; and

(3) Tribal funds—any unauthorized use of tribal funds.

(c) Standard restrictions. The standard restrictions apply to the following uses of non-LSC funds:

(1) Private funds—any use of private funds;

(2) Public funds—any unauthorized use of public funds; and

(3) Tribal funds—any unauthorized use of tribal funds.

(d) Limited restrictions. The limited restrictions do not apply to the use of non-LSC funds.

(e) Other restrictions. The other restrictions apply to non-LSC funds as provided in the referenced regulations. This part neither expands nor limits those requirements.

(f) Inapplicability to part 1611—financial eligibility. This part does not expand, limit, or otherwise apply to the financial eligibility rules of 45 CFR part 1611.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OR. v. Legal Services Corp.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OR. v. Legal Services Corp. (2010) ca9 · cites it 2× “45 C.F.R. § 1610.4 . II. PIR and the LASH Litigation In 1997, in response to a federal district court's injunction declaring several of the 1996 Act's restrictions facially unconstitutional insofar as they applied to LSC grantees' nonfederally funded activities, see Legal Aid…”
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OR. v. Legal Services Corp. (2009) ca9 · cites it 2× “45 C.F.R. § 1610.4 . II. PIR and the LASH Litigation In 1997, in response to a federal district court's injunction declaring several of the 1996 Act's restrictions facially unconstitutional insofar as they applied to LSC grantees' nonfederally funded activities, see Legal Aid…”
Legal Aid Services of Oregon v. Legal Services Corporation (2009) ca9 “45 C.F.R. § 1610.4 . 1 The 1996 Act also prohibited LSC grantees from providing legal assis- tance to certain classes of aliens, seeking to reform welfare, litigating on behalf of prisoners, engaging in activity involving political redistricting, supporting certain advocacy…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.