C.F.R. » Title 45 » SUBCHAPTER D—HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › PART 170—HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATIONS, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS FOR HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY › Subpart C—Certification Criteria for Health Information Technology

45 C.F.R. § 170.314

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: John Doe v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., 106 F.4th 907 (9th Cir. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
John Doe v. Cedars-Sinai Health Sys., 106 F.4th 907 (9th Cir. 2024). · cites it 5× “45 C.F.R. § 170.314 (e)(1)(i); 2 see also 42 C.”
Permenter v. Eclinical Works LLC (M.D. Ga. 2022). · cites it 10× “Relators contend “[t]he security flaws in eClinicalWorks’ software make it impossible for eClinicalWorks to verify that the person seeking access to electronic health information is the one claimed” in violation of 45 C.F.R. § 170.314 (d)(1)(i). Doc. 34. ¶ 121.”
Practice Fusion v. Freedom Specialty Ins. Co. CA1/2 (Cal. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “(See 45 C.F.R. § 170.314 (a)(8) (2012) [setting forth criteria for electronic health record certification with respect to clinical decision support].”
Gonzalez v. Fresno Cmty. Hosp. & Med. Ctr. (E.D. Cal. 2024). “45 C.F.R. § 170.314 (e)(1)(i) provides that “EHR technology must provide patients (and their authorized representatives) with an online means to 26 view, download, and transmit to a 3rd party the data specified below.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.