45 C.F.R. § 2556.405
Who has sole authority to remove a VISTA from a VISTA project and who has sole authority to terminate a VISTA from a VISTA project or the VISTA program?
(a) AmeriCorps has the sole authority to remove a VISTA from a project where they have been assigned.
(b) AmeriCorps has the sole authority to terminate for cause or otherwise terminate a VISTA from the VISTA program.
(c) Neither the sponsoring organization nor any of its subrecipients has the authority to remove a VISTA from a project or to terminate a VISTA for cause, or for any other basis, from the VISTA program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: Amy Harnishfeger v. United States, 943 F.3d 1105 (7th Cir. 2019).
Amy Harnishfeger v. United States, 943 F.3d 1105 (7th Cir. 2019). “When such a request is made, “[t]he State Program Director may, at his . . . discretion, attempt to resolve the situation with the sponsor so that an alternative solution other than removal of the VISTA from the project assignment is reached.”
Amy Harnishfeger v. United States (7th Cir. 2019). “When such a request is made, “[t]he State Program Director may, at his . . . discretion, attempt to resolve the situation with the sponsor so that an alternative solution other than removal of the VISTA from the project assignment is reached.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.