45 C.F.R. § 60.8

Reporting licensure actions taken by Boards of Medical Examiners

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) What actions must be reported. Each Board of Medical Examiners must report to the NPDB any action based on reasons relating to a physician's or dentist's professional competence or professional conduct:

(1) Which revokes or suspends (or otherwise restricts) a physician's or dentist's license,

(2) Which censures, reprimands, or places on probation a physician or dentist, or

(3) Under which a physician's or dentist's license is surrendered.

(b) Information that must be reported. The Board must report the following information for each action:

(1) The physician's or dentist's name,

(2) The physician's or dentist's work address,

(3) The physician's or dentist's home address, if known,

(4) The physician's or dentist's Social Security number or Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN), if known, and if obtained in accordance with section 7 of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a note),

(5) National Provider Identifier (NPI),

(6) The physician's or dentist's date of birth,

(7) Name of each professional school attended by the physician or dentist and year of graduation,

(8) For each professional license, the physician's or dentist's license number, the field of licensure and the name of the state or territory in which the license is held,

(9) The physician's or dentist's Drug Enforcement Administration registration number, if known,

(10) A description of the acts or omissions or other reasons for the action taken,

(11) A description of the Board action, the date the action was taken, its effective date and duration,

(12) Classification of the action in accordance with a reporting code adopted by the Secretary, and

(13) Other information as required by the Secretary from time to time after publication in the Federal Register and after an opportunity for public comment.

(c) Sanctions. If, after notice of noncompliance and providing opportunity to correct noncompliance, the Secretary determines that a Board has failed to submit a report as required by this section, the Secretary will designate another qualified entity for the reporting of information under § 60.12 of this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2010–2014 · leading case: Yost v. State, Div. of Corporations, Bus. & Prof'l Licensing, 234 P.3d 1264 (Alaska 2010).
Yost v. State, Div. of Corporations, Bus. & Prof'l Licensing, 234 P.3d 1264 (Alaska 2010). “§ 11132 ; 45 C.F.R. § 60.8 ; AS 08.64.335. 10 . AS 44.”
Gross v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2011 IL App (1st) 103101 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 3× “For purposes of this subsection ***, ‘discipline’ includes any sanction required to be reported pursuant to 45 CFR 60.8. This subsection *** shall apply only to discipline that is based upon an act or omission in such other state *** that is defined substantially the same as…”
Gross v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg., 960 N.E.2d 704 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 3× “For purposes of this subsection * * *, `discipline' includes any sanction required to be reported pursuant to 45 CFR 60.8. This subsection * * * shall apply only to discipline that is based upon an act or omission in such other state * * * that is defined substantially the same…”
Schwartz v. Khalsa, 482 F. App'x 320 (10th Cir. 2012). “See 45 C.F.R. §§ 60.8 (a)(3), 61.7(a)(2). The Board posted and updated Dr.”
Donna Delouis, D.O. v. Iowa Bd. of Med. (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). “Pursuant to federal rule, 45 C.F.R. § 60.8 (a), “Each Board of Medical Examiners must report to the NPDB [National Practitioner Data Bank] any action based on reasons relating to a physician’s or dentist’s professional competence or professional conduct,” (1) which revokes,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.