5 U.S.C. § 552a

Records maintained on individuals

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Definitions.—For purposes of this section—(1) the term “agency” means agency as defined in section 552(e) 11 See References in Text note below. of this title;(2) the term “individual” means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;(3) the term “maintain” includes maintain, collect, use, or disseminate;(4) the term “record” means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph;(5) the term “system of records” means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual;(6) the term “statistical record” means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual, except as provided by section 8 of title 13;(7) the term “routine use” means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;(8) the term “matching program”—(A) means any computerized comparison of—(i) two or more automated systems of records or a system of records with non-Federal records for the purpose of—(I) establishing or verifying the eligibility of, or continuing compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements by, applicants for, recipients or beneficiaries of, participants in, or providers of services with respect to, cash or in-kind assistance or payments under Federal benefit programs, or(II) recouping payments or delinquent debts under such Federal benefit programs, or(ii) two or more automated Federal personnel or payroll systems of records or a system of Federal personnel or payroll records with non-Federal records,(B) but does not include—(i) matches performed to produce aggregate statistical data without any personal identifiers;(ii) matches performed to support any research or statistical project, the specific data of which may not be used to make decisions concerning the rights, benefits, or privileges of specific individuals;(iii) matches performed, by an agency (or component thereof) which performs as its principal function any activity pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws, subsequent to the initiation of a specific criminal or civil law enforcement investigation of a named person or persons for the purpose of gathering evidence against such person or persons;(iv) matches of tax information (I) pursuant to section 6103(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (II) for purposes of tax administration as defined in section 6103(b)(4) of such Code, (III) for the purpose of intercepting a tax refund due an individual under authority granted by section 404(e), 464, or 1137 of the Social Security Act; or (IV) for the purpose of intercepting a tax refund due an individual under any other tax refund intercept program authorized by statute which has been determined by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to contain verification, notice, and hearing requirements that are substantially similar to the procedures in section 1137 of the Social Security Act;(v) matches—(I) using records predominantly relating to Federal personnel, that are performed for routine administrative purposes (subject to guidance provided by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to subsection (v)); or(II) conducted by an agency using only records from systems of records maintained by that agency; if the purpose of the match is not to take any adverse financial, personnel, disciplinary, or other adverse action against Federal personnel;(vi) matches performed for foreign counterintelligence purposes or to produce background checks for security clearances of Federal personnel or Federal contractor personnel;(vii) matches performed incident to a levy described in section 6103(k)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;(viii) matches performed pursuant to section 202(x)(3) or 1611(e)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(x)(3), 1382(e)(1));(ix) matches performed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services with respect to potential fraud, waste, and abuse, including matches of a system of records with non-Federal records; or(x) matches performed pursuant to section 3(d)(4) of the Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014; ¹(9) the term “recipient agency” means any agency, or contractor thereof, receiving records contained in a system of records from a source agency for use in a matching program;(10) the term “non-Federal agency” means any State or local government, or agency thereof, which receives records contained in a system of records from a source agency for use in a matching program;(11) the term “source agency” means any agency which discloses records contained in a system of records to be used in a matching program, or any State or local government, or agency thereof, which discloses records to be used in a matching program;(12) the term “Federal benefit program” means any program administered or funded by the Federal Government, or by any agent or State on behalf of the Federal Government, providing cash or in-kind assistance in the form of payments, grants, loans, or loan guarantees to individuals; and(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).(b)Conditions of Disclosure.—No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, unless disclosure of the record would be—(1) to those officers and employees of the agency which maintains the record who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;(2) required under section 552 of this title;(3) for a routine use as defined in subsection (a)(7) of this section and described under subsection (e)(4)(D) of this section;(4) to the Bureau of the Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to the provisions of title 13;(5) to a recipient who has provided the agency with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;(6) to the National Archives and Records Administration as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, or for evaluation by the Archivist of the United States or the designee of the Archivist to determine whether the record has such value;(7) to another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity if the activity is authorized by law, and if the head of the agency or instrumentality has made a written request to the agency which maintains the record specifying the particular portion desired and the law enforcement activity for which the record is sought;(8) to a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon such disclosure notification is transmitted to the last known address of such individual;(9) to either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;(10) to the Comptroller General, or any of his authorized representatives, in the course of the performance of the duties of the Government Accountability Office;(11) to the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, or any authorized representative of the Director, in the course of performance of the duties of the Congressional Budget Office;(12) pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction; or(13) to a consumer reporting agency in accordance with section 3711(e) of title 31.(c)Accounting of Certain Disclosures.—Each agency, with respect to each system of records under its control, shall—(1) except for disclosures made under subsections (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section, keep an accurate accounting of—(A) the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record to any person or to another agency made under subsection (b) of this section; and(B) the name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure is made;(2) retain the accounting made under paragraph (1) of this subsection for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, after the disclosure for which the accounting is made;(3) except for disclosures made under subsection (b)(7) of this section, make the accounting made under paragraph (1) of this subsection available to the individual named in the record at his request; and(4) inform any person or other agency about any correction or notation of dispute made by the agency in accordance with subsection (d) of this section of any record that has been disclosed to the person or agency if an accounting of the disclosure was made.(d)Access to Records.—Each agency that maintains a system of records shall—(1) upon request by any individual to gain access to his record or to any information pertaining to him which is contained in the system, permit him and upon his request, a person of his own choosing to accompany him, to review the record and have a copy made of all or any portion thereof in a form comprehensible to him, except that the agency may require the individual to furnish a written statement authorizing discussion of that individual’s record in the accompanying person’s presence;(2) permit the individual to request amendment of a record pertaining to him and—(A) not later than 10 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) after the date of receipt of such request, acknowledge in writing such receipt; and(B) promptly, either—(i) make any correction of any portion thereof which the individual believes is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete; or(ii) inform the individual of its refusal to amend the record in accordance with his request, the reason for the refusal, the procedures established by the agency for the individual to request a review of that refusal by the head of the agency or an officer designated by the head of the agency, and the name and business address of that official;(3) permit the individual who disagrees with the refusal of the agency to amend his record to request a review of such refusal, and not later than 30 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the date on which the individual requests such review, complete such review and make a final determination unless, for good cause shown, the head of the agency extends such 30-day period; and if, after his review, the reviewing official also refuses to amend the record in accordance with the request, permit the individual to file with the agency a concise statement setting forth the reasons for his disagreement with the refusal of the agency, and notify the individual of the provisions for judicial review of the reviewing official’s determination under subsection (g)(1)(A) of this section;(4) in any disclosure, containing information about which the individual has filed a statement of disagreement, occurring after the filing of the statement under paragraph (3) of this subsection, clearly note any portion of the record which is disputed and provide copies of the statement and, if the agency deems it appropriate, copies of a concise statement of the reasons of the agency for not making the amendments requested, to persons or other agencies to whom the disputed record has been disclosed; and(5) nothing in this section shall allow an individual access to any information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.(e)Agency Requirements.—Each agency that maintains a system of records shall—(1) maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required to be accomplished by statute or by executive order of the President;(2) collect information to the greatest extent practicable directly from the subject individual when the information may result in adverse determinations about an individual’s rights, benefits, and privileges under Federal programs;(3) inform each individual whom it asks to supply information, on the form which it uses to collect the information or on a separate form that can be retained by the individual—(A) the authority (whether granted by statute, or by executive order of the President) which authorizes the solicitation of the information and whether disclosure of such information is mandatory or voluntary;(B) the principal purpose or purposes for which the information is intended to be used;(C) the routine uses which may be made of the information, as published pursuant to paragraph (4)(D) of this subsection; and(D) the effects on him, if any, of not providing all or any part of the requested information;(4) subject to the provisions of paragraph (11) of this subsection, publish in the Federal Register upon establishment or revision a notice of the existence and character of the system of records, which notice shall include—(A) the name and location of the system;(B) the categories of individuals on whom records are maintained in the system;(C) the categories of records maintained in the system;(D) each routine use of the records contained in the system, including the categories of users and the purpose of such use;(E) the policies and practices of the agency regarding storage, retrievability, access controls, retention, and disposal of the records;(F) the title and business address of the agency official who is responsible for the system of records;(G) the agency procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his request if the system of records contains a record pertaining to him;(H) the agency procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his request how he can gain access to any record pertaining to him contained in the system of records, and how he can contest its content; and(I) the categories of sources of records in the system;(5) maintain all records which are used by the agency in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in the determination;(6) prior to disseminating any record about an individual to any person other than an agency, unless the dissemination is made pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of this section, make reasonable efforts to assure that such records are accurate, complete, timely, and relevant for agency purposes;(7) maintain no record describing how any individual exercises rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity;(8) make reasonable efforts to serve notice on an individual when any record on such individual is made available to any person under compulsory legal process when such process becomes a matter of public record;(9) establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any system of records, or in maintaining any record, and instruct each such person with respect to such rules and the requirements of this section, including any other rules and procedures adopted pursuant to this section and the penalties for noncompliance;(10) establish appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to insure the security and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their security or integrity which could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained;(11) at least 30 days prior to publication of information under paragraph (4)(D) of this subsection, publish in the Federal Register notice of any new use or intended use of the information in the system, and provide an opportunity for interested persons to submit written data, views, or arguments to the agency; and(12) if such agency is a recipient agency or a source agency in a matching program with a non-Federal agency, with respect to any establishment or revision of a matching program, at least 30 days prior to conducting such program, publish in the Federal Register notice of such establishment or revision.(f)Agency Rules.—In order to carry out the provisions of this section, each agency that maintains a system of records shall promulgate rules, in accordance with the requirements (including general notice) of section 553 of this title, which shall—(1) establish procedures whereby an individual can be notified in response to his request if any system of records named by the individual contains a record pertaining to him;(2) define reasonable times, places, and requirements for identifying an individual who requests his record or information pertaining to him before the agency shall make the record or information available to the individual;(3) establish procedures for the disclosure to an individual upon his request of his record or information pertaining to him, including special procedure, if deemed necessary, for the disclosure to an individual of medical records, including psychological records, pertaining to him;(4) establish procedures for reviewing a request from an individual concerning the amendment of any record or information pertaining to the individual, for making a determination on the request, for an appeal within the agency of an initial adverse agency determination, and for whatever additional means may be necessary for each individual to be able to exercise fully his rights under this section; and(5) establish fees to be charged, if any, to any individual for making copies of his record, excluding the cost of any search for and review of the record.The Office of the Federal Register shall biennially compile and publish the rules promulgated under this subsection and agency notices published under subsection (e)(4) of this section in a form available to the public at low cost.(g)(1)Civil Remedies.—Whenever any agency(A) makes a determination under subsection (d)(3) of this section not to amend an individual’s record in accordance with his request, or fails to make such review in conformity with that subsection;(B) refuses to comply with an individual request under subsection (d)(1) of this section;(C) fails to maintain any record concerning any individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is necessary to assure fairness in any determination relating to the qualifications, character, rights, or opportunities of, or benefits to the individual that may be made on the basis of such record, and consequently a determination is made which is adverse to the individual; or(D) fails to comply with any other provision of this section, or any rule promulgated thereunder, in such a way as to have an adverse effect on an individual,the individual may bring a civil action against the agency, and the district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction in the matters under the provisions of this subsection.(2)(A) In any suit brought under the provisions of subsection (g)(1)(A) of this section, the court may order the agency to amend the individual’s record in accordance with his request or in such other way as the court may direct. In such a case the court shall determine the matter de novo.(B) The court may assess against the United States reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in any case under this paragraph in which the complainant has substantially prevailed.(3)(A) In any suit brought under the provisions of subsection (g)(1)(B) of this section, the court may enjoin the agency from withholding the records and order the production to the complainant of any agency records improperly withheld from him. In such a case the court shall determine the matter de novo, and may examine the contents of any agency records in camera to determine whether the records or any portion thereof may be withheld under any of the exemptions set forth in subsection (k) of this section, and the burden is on the agency to sustain its action.(B) The court may assess against the United States reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in any case under this paragraph in which the complainant has substantially prevailed.(4) In any suit brought under the provisions of subsection (g)(1)(C) or (D) of this section in which the court determines that the agency acted in a manner which was intentional or willful, the United States shall be liable to the individual in an amount equal to the sum of—(A) actual damages sustained by the individual as a result of the refusal or failure, but in no case shall a person entitled to recovery receive less than the sum of $1,000; and(B) the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court.(5) An action to enforce any liability created under this section may be brought in the district court of the United States in the district in which the complainant resides, or has his principal place of business, or in which the agency records are situated, or in the District of Columbia, without regard to the amount in controversy, within two years from the date on which the cause of action arises, except that where an agency has materially and willfully misrepresented any information required under this section to be disclosed to an individual and the information so misrepresented is material to establishment of the liability of the agency to the individual under this section, the action may be brought at any time within two years after discovery by the individual of the misrepresentation. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize any civil action by reason of any injury sustained as the result of a disclosure of a record prior to September 27, 1975.(h)Rights of Legal Guardians.—For the purposes of this section, the parent of any minor, or the legal guardian of any individual who has been declared to be incompetent due to physical or mental incapacity or age by a court of competent jurisdiction, may act on behalf of the individual.(i)(1)Criminal Penalties.—Any officer or employee of an agency, who by virtue of his employment or official position, has possession of, or access to, agency records which contain individually identifiable information the disclosure of which is prohibited by this section or by rules or regulations established thereunder, and who knowing that disclosure of the specific material is so prohibited, willfully discloses the material in any manner to any person or agency not entitled to receive it, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.(2) Any officer or employee of any agency who willfully maintains a system of records without meeting the notice requirements of subsection (e)(4) of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.(3) Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from an agency under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.(j)General Exemptions.—The head of any agency may promulgate rules, in accordance with the requirements (including general notice) of sections 553(b)(1), (2), and (3), (c), and (e) of this title, to exempt any system of records within the agency from any part of this section except subsections (b), (c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i) if the system of records is—(1) maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency; or(2) maintained by an agency or component thereof which performs as its principal function any activity pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws, including police efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or to apprehend criminals, and the activities of prosecutors, courts, correctional, probation, pardon, or parole authorities, and which consists of (A) information compiled for the purpose of identifying individual criminal offenders and alleged offenders and consisting only of identifying data and notations of arrests, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, release, and parole and probation status; (B) information compiled for the purpose of a criminal investigation, including reports of informants and investigators, and associated with an identifiable individual; or (C) reports identifiable to an individual compiled at any stage of the process of enforcement of the criminal laws from arrest or indictment through release from supervision.At the time rules are adopted under this subsection, the agency shall include in the statement required under section 553(c) of this title, the reasons why the system of records is to be exempted from a provision of this section.(k)Specific Exemptions.—The head of any agency may promulgate rules, in accordance with the requirements (including general notice) of sections 553(b)(1), (2), and (3), (c), and (e) of this title, to exempt any system of records within the agency from subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) and (f) of this section if the system of records is—(1) subject to the provisions of section 552(b)(1) of this title;(2) investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of subsection (j)(2) of this section: Provided, however, That if any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit that he would otherwise be entitled by Federal law, or for which he would otherwise be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, such material shall be provided to such individual, except to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence;(3) maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or other individuals pursuant to section 3056 of title 18;(4) required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records;(5) investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment, military service, Federal contracts, or access to classified information, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence;(6) testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process; or(7) evaluation material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.At the time rules are adopted under this subsection, the agency shall include in the statement required under section 553(c) of this title, the reasons why the system of records is to be exempted from a provision of this section.(l)(1)Archival Records.—Each agency record which is accepted by the Archivist of the United States for storage, processing, and servicing in accordance with section 3103 of title 44 shall, for the purposes of this section, be considered to be maintained by the agency which deposited the record and shall be subject to the provisions of this section. The Archivist of the United States shall not disclose the record except to the agency which maintains the record, or under rules established by that agency which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this section.(2) Each agency record pertaining to an identifiable individual which was transferred to the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, prior to the effective date of this section, shall, for the purposes of this section, be considered to be maintained by the National Archives and shall not be subject to the provisions of this section, except that a statement generally describing such records (modeled after the requirements relating to records subject to subsections (e)(4)(A) through (G) of this section) shall be published in the Federal Register.(3) Each agency record pertaining to an identifiable individual which is transferred to the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government, on or after the effective date of this section, shall, for the purposes of this section, be considered to be maintained by the National Archives and shall be exempt from the requirements of this section except subsections (e)(4)(A) through (G) and (e)(9) of this section.(m)(1)Government Contractors.—When an agency provides by a contract for the operation by or on behalf of the agency of a system of records to accomplish an agency function, the agency shall, consistent with its authority, cause the requirements of this section to be applied to such system. For purposes of subsection (i) of this section any such contractor and any employee of such contractor, if such contract is agreed to on or after the effective date of this section, shall be considered to be an employee of an agency.(2) A consumer reporting agency to which a record is disclosed under section 3711(e) of title 31 shall not be considered a contractor for the purposes of this section.(n)Mailing Lists.—An individual’s name and address may not be sold or rented by an agency unless such action is specifically authorized by law. This provision shall not be construed to require the withholding of names and addresses otherwise permitted to be made public.(o)Matching Agreements.—(1) No record which is contained in a system of records may be disclosed to a recipient agency or non-Federal agency for use in a computer matching program except pursuant to a written agreement between the source agency and the recipient agency or non-Federal agency specifying—(A) the purpose and legal authority for conducting the program;(B) the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings;(C) a description of the records that will be matched, including each data element that will be used, the approximate number of records that will be matched, and the projected starting and completion dates of the matching program;(D) procedures for providing individualized notice at the time of application, and notice periodically thereafter as directed by the Data Integrity Board of such agency (subject to guidance provided by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to subsection (v)), to—(i) applicants for and recipients of financial assistance or payments under Federal benefit programs, and(ii) applicants for and holders of positions as Federal personnel,that any information provided by such applicants, recipients, holders, and individuals may be subject to verification through matching programs;(E) procedures for verifying information produced in such matching program as required by subsection (p);(F) procedures for the retention and timely destruction of identifiable records created by a recipient agency or non-Federal agency in such matching program;(G) procedures for ensuring the administrative, technical, and physical security of the records matched and the results of such programs;(H) prohibitions on duplication and redisclosure of records provided by the source agency within or outside the recipient agency or the non-Federal agency, except where required by law or essential to the conduct of the matching program;(I) procedures governing the use by a recipient agency or non-Federal agency of records provided in a matching program by a source agency, including procedures governing return of the records to the source agency or destruction of records used in such program;(J) information on assessments that have been made on the accuracy of the records that will be used in such matching program; and(K) that the Comptroller General may have access to all records of a recipient agency or a non-Federal agency that the Comptroller General deems necessary in order to monitor or verify compliance with the agreement.(2)(A) A copy of each agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1) shall—(i) be transmitted to the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives; and(ii) be available upon request to the public.(B) No such agreement shall be effective until 30 days after the date on which such a copy is transmitted pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i).(C) Such an agreement shall remain in effect only for such period, not to exceed 18 months, as the Data Integrity Board of the agency determines is appropriate in light of the purposes, and length of time necessary for the conduct, of the matching program.(D) Within 3 months prior to the expiration of such an agreement pursuant to subparagraph (C), the Data Integrity Board of the agency may, without additional review, renew the matching agreement for a current, ongoing matching program for not more than one additional year if—(i) such program will be conducted without any change; and(ii) each party to the agreement certifies to the Board in writing that the program has been conducted in compliance with the agreement.(p)Verification and Opportunity to Contest Findings.—(1) In order to protect any individual whose records are used in a matching program, no recipient agency, non-Federal agency, or source agency may suspend, terminate, reduce, or make a final denial of any financial assistance or payment under a Federal benefit program to such individual, or take other adverse action against such individual, as a result of information produced by such matching program, until—(A)(i) the agency has independently verified the information; or(ii) the Data Integrity Board of the agency, or in the case of a non-Federal agency the Data Integrity Board of the source agency, determines in accordance with guidance issued by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget that—(I) the information is limited to identification and amount of benefits paid by the source agency under a Federal benefit program; and(II) there is a high degree of confidence that the information provided to the recipient agency is accurate;(B) the individual receives a notice from the agency containing a statement of its findings and informing the individual of the opportunity to contest such findings; and(C)(i) the expiration of any time period established for the program by statute or regulation for the individual to respond to that notice; or(ii) in the case of a program for which no such period is established, the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which notice under subparagraph (B) is mailed or otherwise provided to the individual.(2) Independent verification referred to in paragraph (1) requires investigation and confirmation of specific information relating to an individual that is used as a basis for an adverse action against the individual, including where applicable investigation and confirmation of—(A) the amount of any asset or income involved;(B) whether such individual actually has or had access to such asset or income for such individual’s own use; and(C) the period or periods when the individual actually had such asset or income.(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an agency may take any appropriate action otherwise prohibited by such paragraph if the agency determines that the public health or public safety may be adversely affected or significantly threatened during any notice period required by such paragraph.(q)Sanctions.—(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no source agency may disclose any record which is contained in a system of records to a recipient agency or non-Federal agency for a matching program if such source agency has reason to believe that the requirements of subsection (p), or any matching agreement entered into pursuant to subsection (o), or both, are not being met by such recipient agency.(2) No source agency may renew a matching agreement unless—(A) the recipient agency or non-Federal agency has certified that it has complied with the provisions of that agreement; and(B) the source agency has no reason to believe that the certification is inaccurate.(r)Report on New Systems and Matching Programs.—Each agency that proposes to establish or make a significant change in a system of records or a matching program shall provide adequate advance notice of any such proposal (in duplicate) to the Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate, and the Office of Management and Budget in order to permit an evaluation of the probable or potential effect of such proposal on the privacy or other rights of individuals.(s)Biennial Report.—The President shall biennially submit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate a report—(1) describing the actions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to section 6 of the Privacy Act of 1974 during the preceding 2 years;(2) describing the exercise of individual rights of access and amendment under this section during such years;(3) identifying changes in or additions to systems of records;(4) containing such other information concerning administration of this section as may be necessary or useful to the Congress in reviewing the effectiveness of this section in carrying out the purposes of the Privacy Act of 1974.(t)(1)Effect of Other Laws.—No agency shall rely on any exemption contained in section 552 of this title to withhold from an individual any record which is otherwise accessible to such individual under the provisions of this section.(2) No agency shall rely on any exemption in this section to withhold from an individual any record which is otherwise accessible to such individual under the provisions of section 552 of this title.(u)Data Integrity Boards.—(1) Every agency conducting or participating in a matching program shall establish a Data Integrity Board to oversee and coordinate among the various components of such agency the agency’s implementation of this section.(2) Each Data Integrity Board shall consist of senior officials designated by the head of the agency, and shall include any senior official designated by the head of the agency as responsible for implementation of this section, and the inspector general of the agency, if any. The inspector general shall not serve as chairman of the Data Integrity Board.(3) Each Data Integrity Board—(A) shall review, approve, and maintain all written agreements for receipt or disclosure of agency records for matching programs to ensure compliance with subsection (o), and all relevant statutes, regulations, and guidelines;(B) shall review all matching programs in which the agency has participated during the year, either as a source agency or recipient agency, determine compliance with applicable laws, regulations, guidelines, and agency agreements, and assess the costs and benefits of such programs;(C) shall review all recurring matching programs in which the agency has participated during the year, either as a source agency or recipient agency, for continued justification for such disclosures;(D) shall compile an annual report, which shall be submitted to the head of the agency and the Office of Management and Budget and made available to the public on request, describing the matching activities of the agency, including—(i) matching programs in which the agency has participated as a source agency or recipient agency;(ii) matching agreements proposed under subsection (o) that were disapproved by the Board;(iii) any changes in membership or structure of the Board in the preceding year;(iv) the reasons for any waiver of the requirement in paragraph (4) of this section for completion and submission of a cost-benefit analysis prior to the approval of a matching program;(v) any violations of matching agreements that have been alleged or identified and any corrective action taken; and(vi) any other information required by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to be included in such report;(E) shall serve as a clearinghouse for receiving and providing information on the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of records used in matching programs;(F) shall provide interpretation and guidance to agency components and personnel on the requirements of this section for matching programs;(G) shall review agency recordkeeping and disposal policies and practices for matching programs to assure compliance with this section; and(H) may review and report on any agency matching activities that are not matching programs.(4)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), a Data Integrity Board shall not approve any written agreement for a matching program unless the agency has completed and submitted to such Board a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed program and such analysis demonstrates that the program is likely to be cost effective.22 So in original. Probably should be “cost-effective.”(B) The Board may waive the requirements of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph if it determines in writing, in accordance with guidelines prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, that a cost-benefit analysis is not required.(C) A cost-benefit analysis shall not be required under subparagraph (A) prior to the initial approval of a written agreement for a matching program that is specifically required by statute. Any subsequent written agreement for such a program shall not be approved by the Data Integrity Board unless the agency has submitted a cost-benefit analysis of the program as conducted under the preceding approval of such agreement.(5)(A) If a matching agreement is disapproved by a Data Integrity Board, any party to such agreement may appeal the disapproval to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Timely notice of the filing of such an appeal shall be provided by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives.(B) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget may approve a matching agreement notwithstanding the disapproval of a Data Integrity Board if the Director determines that—(i) the matching program will be consistent with all applicable legal, regulatory, and policy requirements;(ii) there is adequate evidence that the matching agreement will be cost-effective; and(iii) the matching program is in the public interest.(C) The decision of the Director to approve a matching agreement shall not take effect until 30 days after it is reported to committees described in subparagraph (A).(D) If the Data Integrity Board and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget disapprove a matching program proposed by the inspector general of an agency, the inspector general may report the disapproval to the head of the agency and to the Congress.(6) In the reports required by paragraph (3)(D), agency matching activities that are not matching programs may be reported on an aggregate basis, if and to the extent necessary to protect ongoing law enforcement or counterintelligence investigations.(v)Office of Management and Budget Responsibilities.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall—(1) develop and, after notice and opportunity for public comment, prescribe guidelines and regulations for the use of agencies in implementing the provisions of this section; and(2) provide continuing assistance to and oversight of the implementation of this section by agencies.(w)Applicability to Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.—Except as provided in the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, this section shall apply with respect to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.(Added Pub. L. 93–579, § 3, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1897; amended Pub. L. 94–183, § 2(2), Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1057; Pub. L. 97–365, § 2, Oct. 25, 1982, 96 Stat. 1749; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, § 201(a), (b), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1821; Pub. L. 97–452, § 2(a)(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2478; Pub. L. 98–477, § 2(c), Oct. 15, 1984, 98 Stat. 2211; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, § 107(g), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2292; Pub. L. 100–503, §§ 2–6(a), 7, 8, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2507–2514; Pub. L. 101–508, title VII, § 7201(b)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–334; Pub. L. 103–66, title XIII, § 13581(c), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 104–193, title I, § 110(w), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2175; Pub. L. 104–226, § 1(b)(3), Oct. 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 3033; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, § 115(g)(2)(B), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3835; Pub. L. 105–34, title X, § 1026(b)(2), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 925; Pub. L. 105–362, title XIII, § 1301(d), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3293; Pub. L. 106–170, title IV, § 402(a)(2), Dec. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 1908; Pub. L. 108–271, § 8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 111–148, title VI, § 6402(b)(2), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 756; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1082, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2080; Pub. L. 113–295, div. B, title I, § 102(d), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4062; Pub. L. 118–104, § 2, Oct. 2, 2024, 138 Stat. 1586.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 552(e) of this title, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was redesignated section 552(f) of this title by section 1802(b) of Pub. L. 99–570.

Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (a)(8)(B)(iv), (vii), is classified to section 6103 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Sections 404, 464, and 1137 of the Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(8)(B)(iv), are classified to sections 604, 664, and 1320b–7, respectively, of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

The Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014, referred to in subsec. (a)(8)(B)(x), probably means Pub. L. 113–295, div. B, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4056, known as the Stephen Beck, Jr., Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014 or the Stephen Beck, Jr., ABLE Act of 2014. The Act does not contain a section 3.

For effective date of this section, referred to in subsecs. (k)(2), (5), (7), (l)(2), (3), and (m), see Effective Date note below.

Section 6 of the Privacy Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (s)(1), is section 6 of Pub. L. 93–579, which was set out below and was repealed by section 6(c) of Pub. L. 100–503.

For classification of the Privacy Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (s)(4), see Short Title note below.

The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, referred to in subsec. (w), is title X of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1955, which enacted subchapter V (§ 5481 et seq.) of chapter 53 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and enacted and amended numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of Title 12 and Tables.

Codification

Section 552a of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, was transferred to section 2244 of Title 7, Agriculture.

Amendments

2024—Subsec. (b)(11) to (13). Pub. L. 118–104 added par. (11) and redesignated former pars. (11) and (12) as (12) and (13), respectively.

2014—Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(x). Pub. L. 113–295 added cl. (x).

2010—Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(ix). Pub. L. 111–148 added cl. (ix).

Subsec. (w). Pub. L. 111–203 added subsec. (w).

2004—Subsec. (b)(10). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted “Government Accountability Office” for “General Accounting Office”.

1999—Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(viii). Pub. L. 106–170 added cl. (viii).

1998—Subsec. (u)(6), (7). Pub. L. 105–362 redesignated par. (7) as (6), substituted “paragraph (3)(D)” for “paragraphs (3)(D) and (6)”, and struck out former par. (6) which read as follows: “The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall, annually during the first 3 years after the date of enactment of this subsection and biennially thereafter, consolidate in a report to the Congress the information contained in the reports from the various Data Integrity Boards under paragraph (3)(D). Such report shall include detailed information about costs and benefits of matching programs that are conducted during the period covered by such consolidated report, and shall identify each waiver granted by a Data Integrity Board of the requirement for completion and submission of a cost-benefit analysis and the reasons for granting the waiver.”

1997—Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(vii). Pub. L. 105–34 added cl. (vii).

1996—Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(iv)(III). Pub. L. 104–193 substituted “section 404(e), 464,” for “section 464”.

Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(v) to (vii). Pub. L. 104–226 inserted “or” at end of cl. (v), struck out “or” at end of cl. (vi), and struck out cl. (vii) which read as follows: “matches performed pursuant to section 6103(l)(12) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section 1144 of the Social Security Act;”.

Subsecs. (b)(12), (m)(2). Pub. L. 104–316 substituted “3711(e)” for “3711(f)”.

1993—Subsec. (a)(8)(B)(vii). Pub. L. 103–66 added cl. (vii).

1990—Subsec. (p). Pub. L. 101–508 amended subsec. (p) generally, restating former pars. (1) and (3) as par. (1), adding provisions relating to Data Integrity Boards, and restating former pars. (2) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively.

1988—Subsec. (a)(8) to (13). Pub. L. 100–503, § 5, added pars. (8) to (13).

Subsec. (e)(12). Pub. L. 100–503, § 3(a), added par. (12).

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 100–503, § 7, substituted “biennially” for “annually” in last sentence.

Subsecs. (o) to (q). Pub. L. 100–503, § 2(2), added subsecs. (o) to (q). Former subsecs. (o) to (q) redesignated (r) to (t), respectively.

Subsec. (r). Pub. L. 100–503, § 3(b), inserted “and matching programs” in heading and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Each agency shall provide adequate advance notice to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget of any proposal to establish or alter any system of records in order to permit an evaluation of the probable or potential effect of such proposal on the privacy and other personal or property rights of individuals or the disclosure of information relating to such individuals, and its effect on the preservation of the constitutional principles of federalism and separation of powers.”

Pub. L. 100–503, § 2(1), redesignated former subsec. (o) as (r).

Subsec. (s). Pub. L. 100–503, § 8, substituted “Biennial” for “Annual” in heading, “biennially submit” for “annually submit” in introductory provisions, “preceding 2 years” for “preceding year” in par. (1), and “such years” for “such year” in par. (2).

Pub. L. 100–503, § 2(1), redesignated former subsec. (p) as (s).

Subsec. (t). Pub. L. 100–503, § 2(1), redesignated former subsec. (q) as (t).

Subsec. (u). Pub. L. 100–503, § 4, added subsec. (u).

Subsec. (v). Pub. L. 100–503, § 6(a), added subsec. (v).

1984—Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 98–497, § 107(g)(1), substituted “National Archives and Records Administration” for “National Archives of the United States”, and “Archivist of the United States or the designee of the Archivist” for “Administrator of General Services or his designee”.

Subsec. (l)(1). Pub. L. 98–497, § 107(g)(2), substituted “Archivist of the United States” for “Administrator of General Services” in two places.

Subsec. (q). Pub. L. 98–477 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

1983—Subsec. (b)(12). Pub. L. 97–452 substituted “section 3711(f) of title 31” for “section 3(d) of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 (31 U.S.C. 952(d))”.

Subsec. (m)(2). Pub. L. 97–452 substituted “section 3711(f) of title 31” for “section 3(d) of the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 (31 U.S.C. 952(d))”.

1982—Subsec. (b)(12). Pub. L. 97–365, § 2(a), added par. (12).

Subsec. (e)(4). Pub. L. 97–375, § 201(a), substituted “upon establishment or revision” for “at least annually” after “Federal Register”.

Subsec. (m). Pub. L. 97–365, § 2(b), designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

Subsec. (p). Pub. L. 97–375, § 201(b), substituted provisions requiring annual submission of a report by the President to the Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate relating to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, individual rights of access, changes or additions to systems of records, and other necessary or useful information, for provisions which had directed the President to submit to the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate, by June 30 of each calendar year, a consolidated report, separately listing for each Federal agency the number of records contained in any system of records which were exempted from the application of this section under the provisions of subsections (j) and (k) of this section during the preceding calendar year, and the reasons for the exemptions, and such other information as indicate efforts to administer fully this section.

1975—Subsec. (g)(5). Pub. L. 94–183 substituted “to September 27, 1975” for “to the effective date of this section”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesChange of Name

Committee on Governmental Affairs of Senate changed to Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of Senate, effective Jan. 4, 2005, by Senate Resolution No. 445, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Oct. 9, 2004.

Committee on Government Operations of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of House of Representatives by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress. Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Government Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999. Committee on Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2019. Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023.

Effective Date of 2014 Amendment

Pub. L. 113–295, div. B, title I, § 102(f)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4062, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [enacting section 529A of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, and amending this section, section 5517 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and sections 26, 877A, 4965, 4973, and 6693 of Title 26] shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.”

Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1082, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2080, provided that the amendment made by section 1082 is effective on July 21, 2010.

Pub. L. 111–203, title X, § 1100H, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2113, provided that: “Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle [subtitle H (§§ 1081–1100H) of title X of Pub. L. 111–203, see Tables for classification] and the amendments made by this subtitle, this subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle, other than sections 1081 [amending section 8G of Pub. L. 95–452, formerly set out in the Appendix to this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 8G of Pub. L. 95–452] and 1082 [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note under this section], shall become effective on the designated transfer date.”

[The term “designated transfer date” is defined in section 5481(9) of Title 12, Banks and Banking, as the date established under section 5582 of Title 12, which is July 21, 2011.]

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–170 applicable to individuals whose period of confinement in an institution commences on or after the first day of the fourth month beginning after December 1999, see section 402(a)(4) of Pub. L. 106–170, set out as a note under section 402 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–34 applicable to levies issued after Aug. 5, 1997, see section 1026(c) of Pub. L. 105–34, set out as a note under section 6103 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–193 effective July 1, 1997, with transition rules relating to State options to accelerate such date, rules relating to claims, actions, and proceedings commenced before such date, rules relating to closing out of accounts for terminated or substantially modified programs and continuance in office of Assistant Secretary for Family Support, and provisions relating to termination of entitlement under AFDC program, see section 116 of Pub. L. 104–193, as amended, set out as an Effective Date note under section 601 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–66 effective Jan. 1, 1994, see section 13581(d) of Pub. L. 103–66, set out as a note under section 1395y of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–503, § 10, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2514, as amended by Pub. L. 101–56, § 2, July 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 149, provided that:“(a)In General.—Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), the amendments made by this Act [amending this section and repealing provisions set out as a note below] shall take effect 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 18, 1988].“(b)Exceptions.—The amendment made by sections 3(b), 6, 7, and 8 of this Act [amending this section and repealing provisions set out as a note below] shall take effect upon enactment.“(c)Effective Date Delayed for Existing Programs.—In the case of any matching program (as defined in section 552a(a)(8) of title 5, United States Code, as added by section 5 of this Act) in operation before June 1, 1989, the amendments made by this Act (other than the amendments described in subsection (b)) shall take effect January 1, 1990, if—“(1) such matching program is identified by an agency as being in operation before June 1, 1989; and“(2) such identification is—“(A) submitted by the agency to the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Government Operations of the House of Representatives, and the Office of Management and Budget before August 1, 1989, in a report which contains a schedule showing the dates on which the agency expects to have such matching program in compliance with the amendments made by this Act, and“(B) published by the Office of Management and Budget in the Federal Register, before September 15, 1989.”

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–579, § 8, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1910, provided that: “The provisions of this Act [enacting this section and provisions set out as notes under this section] shall be effective on and after the date of enactment [Dec. 31, 1974], except that the amendments made by sections 3 and 4 [enacting this section and amending analysis preceding section 500 of this title] shall become effective 270 days following the day on which this Act is enacted.”

Short Title of 1990 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–508, title VII, § 7201(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–334, provided that: “This section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as notes below] may be cited as the ‘Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Amendments of 1990’.”

Short Title of 1989 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–56, § 1, July 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 149, provided that: “This Act [amending section 10 of Pub. L. 100–503, set out as a note above] may be cited as the ‘Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act Amendments of 1989’.”

Short Title of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–503, § 1, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2507, provided that: “This Act [amending this section, enacting provisions set out as notes above and below, and repealing provisions set out as a note below] may be cited as the ‘Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988’.”

Short Title of 1974 Amendment

Pub. L. 93–579, § 1, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1896, provided: “That this Act [enacting this section and provisions set out as notes under this section] may be cited as the ‘Privacy Act of 1974’.”

Short Title

This section is popularly known as the “Privacy Act” and the “Privacy Act of 1974”.

Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in subsec. (s) of this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 31 of House Document No. 103–7.

Delegation of Functions

Functions of Director of Office of Management and Budget under this section delegated to Administrator for Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs by section 3 of Pub. L. 96–511, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2825, set out as a note under section 3503 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

OMB Guidance on Electronic Consent and Access Forms

Pub. L. 116–50, § 3, Aug. 22, 2019, 133 Stat. 1073, provided that:“(a)Guidance.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 22, 2019], the Director shall issue guidance that does the following:“(1) Requires each agency to accept electronic identity proofing and authentication processes for the purposes of allowing an individual to provide prior written consent for the disclosure of the individual’s records under section 552a(b) of title 5, United States Code, or for individual access to records under section 552a(d) of such title.“(2) Creates a template for electronic consent and access forms and requires each agency to post the template on the agency website and to accept the forms from any individual properly identity proofed and authenticated in accordance with paragraph (1) for the purpose of authorizing disclosure of the individual’s records under section 552a(b) of title 5, United States Code, or for individual access to records under section 552a(d) of such title.“(3) Requires each agency to accept the electronic consent and access forms described in paragraph (2) from any individual properly identity proofed and authenticated in accordance with paragraph (1) for the purpose of authorizing disclosure of the individual’s records to another entity, including a congressional office, in accordance with section 552a(b) of title 5, United States Code, or for individual access to records under section 552a(d) [of such title].“(b)Agency Compliance.—Each agency shall comply with the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (a) not later than 1 year after the date on which such guidance is issued.“(c)Definitions.—In this section:“(1)Agency; individual; record.—The terms ‘agency’, ‘individual’, and ‘record’ have the meanings given those terms in section 552a(a) of title 5, United States Code.“(2)Director.—The term ‘Director’ means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.”

Extension of Privacy Act Remedies to Citizens of Designated Countries

Pub. L. 114–126, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 282, provided that:

“SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

“This Act may be cited as the ‘Judicial Redress Act of 2015’.

“SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PRIVACY ACT REMEDIES TO CITIZENS OF DESIGNATED COUNTRIES.“(a)Civil Action; Civil Remedies.—With respect to covered records, a covered person may bring a civil action against an agency and obtain civil remedies, in the same manner, to the same extent, and subject to the same limitations, including exemptions and exceptions, as an individual may bring and obtain with respect to records under—“(1)section 552a(g)(1)(D) of title 5, United States Code, but only with respect to disclosures intentionally or willfully made in violation of section 552a(b) of such title; and“(2) subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 552a(g)(1) of title 5, United States Code, but such an action may only be brought against a designated Federal agency or component.“(b)Exclusive Remedies.—The remedies set forth in subsection (a) are the exclusive remedies available to a covered person under this section.“(c)Application of the Privacy Act With Respect to a Covered Person.—For purposes of a civil action described in subsection (a), a covered person shall have the same rights, and be subject to the same limitations, including exemptions and exceptions, as an individual has and is subject to under section 552a of title 5, United States Code, when pursuing the civil remedies described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).“(d)Designation of Covered Country.—“(1)In general.—The Attorney General may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, designate a foreign country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, as a ‘covered country’ for purposes of this section if—“(A)(i) the country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, has entered into an agreement with the United States that provides for appropriate privacy protections for information shared for the purpose of preventing, investigating, detecting, or prosecuting criminal offenses; or“(ii) the Attorney General has determined that the country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, has effectively shared information with the United States for the purpose of preventing, investigating, detecting, or prosecuting criminal offenses and has appropriate privacy protections for such shared information;“(B) the country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, permits the transfer of personal data for commercial purposes between the territory of that country or regional economic organization and the territory of the United States, through an agreement with the United States or otherwise; and“(C) the Attorney General has certified that the policies regarding the transfer of personal data for commercial purposes and related actions of the country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, do not materially impede the national security interests of the United States.“(2)Removal of designation.—The Attorney General may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, revoke the designation of a foreign country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, as a ‘covered country’ if the Attorney General determines that such designated ‘covered country’—“(A) is not complying with the agreement described under paragraph (1)(A)(i);“(B) no longer meets the requirements for designation under paragraph (1)(A)(ii);“(C) fails to meet the requirements under paragraph (1)(B);“(D) no longer meets the requirements for certification under paragraph (1)(C); or“(E) impedes the transfer of information (for purposes of reporting or preventing unlawful activity) to the United States by a private entity or person.“(e)Designation of Designated Federal Agency or Component.—“(1)In general.—The Attorney General shall determine whether an agency or component thereof is a ‘designated Federal agency or component’ for purposes of this section. The Attorney General shall not designate any agency or component thereof other than the Department of Justice or a component of the Department of Justice without the concurrence of the head of the relevant agency, or of the agency to which the component belongs.“(2)Requirements for designation.—The Attorney General may determine that an agency or component of an agency is a ‘designated Federal agency or component’ for purposes of this section, if—“(A) the Attorney General determines that information exchanged by such agency with a covered country is within the scope of an agreement referred to in subsection (d)(1)(A); or“(B) with respect to a country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, that has been designated as a ‘covered country’ under subsection (d)(1)(B), the Attorney General determines that designating such agency or component thereof is in the law enforcement interests of the United States.“(f)Federal Register Requirement; Nonreviewable Determination.—The Attorney General shall publish each determination made under subsections (d) and (e). Such determination shall not be subject to judicial or administrative review.“(g)Jurisdiction.—The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim arising under this section.“(h)Definitions.—In this Act:“(1)Agency.—The term ‘agency’ has the meaning given that term in section 552(f) of title 5, United States Code.“(2)Covered country.—The term ‘covered country’ means a country or regional economic integration organization, or member country of such organization, designated in accordance with subsection (d).“(3)Covered person.—The term ‘covered person’ means a natural person (other than an individual) who is a citizen of a covered country.“(4)Covered record.—The term ‘covered record’ has the same meaning for a covered person as a record has for an individual under section 552a of title 5, United States Code, once the covered record is transferred—“(A) by a public authority of, or private entity within, a country or regional economic organization, or member country of such organization, which at the time the record is transferred is a covered country; and“(B) to a designated Federal agency or component for purposes of preventing, investigating, detecting, or prosecuting criminal offenses.“(5)Designated federal agency or component.—The term ‘designated Federal agency or component’ means a Federal agency or component of an agency designated in accordance with subsection (e).“(6)Individual.—The term ‘individual’ has the meaning given that term in section 552a(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code.“(i)Preservation of Privileges.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive any applicable privilege or require the disclosure of classified information. Upon an agency’s request, the district court shall review in camera and ex parte any submission by the agency in connection with this subsection.“(j)Effective Date.—This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Feb. 24, 2016].”

Publication of Guidance Under Subsection (p)(1)(A)(ii)

Pub. L. 101–508, title VII, § 7201(b)(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–334, provided that: “Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 5, 1990], the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall publish guidance under subsection (p)(1)(A)(ii) of section 552a of title 5, United States Code, as amended by this Act.”

Limitation on Application of Verification Requirement

Pub. L. 101–508, title VII, § 7201(c), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–335, provided that: “Section 552a(p)(1)(A)(ii)(II) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by section 2 [probably means section 7201(b)(1) of Pub. L. 101–508], shall not apply to a program referred to in paragraph (1), (2), or (4) of section 1137(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–7), until the earlier of—“(1) the date on which the Data Integrity Board of the Federal agency which administers that program determines that there is not a high degree of confidence that information provided by that agency under Federal matching programs is accurate; or“(2) 30 days after the date of publication of guidance under section 2(b) [probably means section 7201(b)(2) of Pub. L. 101–508, set out as a note above].”

Effective Date Delayed for Certain Education Benefits Computer Matching Programs

Pub. L. 101–366, title II, § 206(d), Aug. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 442, provided that:“(1) In the case of computer matching programs between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense in the administration of education benefits programs under chapters 30 and 32 of title 38 and chapter 106 of title 10, United States Code, the amendments made to section 552a of title 5, United States Code, by the Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988 [Pub. L. 100–503] (other than the amendments made by section 10(b) of that Act) [see Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note above] shall take effect on October 1, 1990.“(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘matching program’ has the same meaning provided in section 552a(a)(8) of title 5, United States Code.”

Implementation Guidance for 1988 Amendments

Pub. L. 100–503, § 6(b), Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2513, required the Director, pursuant to section 552a(v) of this title, to develop guidelines and regulations for the use of agencies in implementing amendments made by Pub. L. 100–503 not later than 8 months after Oct. 18, 1988.

Construction of 1988 Amendments

Pub. L. 100–503, § 9, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2514, provided that: “Nothing in the amendments made by this Act [amending this section and repealing provisions set out as a note below] shall be construed to authorize—“(1) the establishment or maintenance by any agency of a national data bank that combines, merges, or links information on individuals maintained in systems of records by other Federal agencies;“(2) the direct linking of computerized systems of records maintained by Federal agencies;“(3) the computer matching of records not otherwise authorized by law; or“(4) the disclosure of records for computer matching except to a Federal, State, or local agency.”

Congressional Findings and Statement of Purpose

Pub. L. 93–579, § 2, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1896, provided that:“(a) The Congress finds that—“(1) the privacy of an individual is directly affected by the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of personal information by Federal agencies;“(2) the increasing use of computers and sophisticated information technology, while essential to the efficient operations of the Government, has greatly magnified the harm to individual privacy that can occur from any collection, maintenance, use, or dissemination of personal information;“(3) the opportunities for an individual to secure employment, insurance, and credit, and his right to due process, and other legal protections are endangered by the misuse of certain information systems;“(4) the right to privacy is a personal and fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United States; and“(5) in order to protect the privacy of individuals identified in information systems maintained by Federal agencies, it is necessary and proper for the Congress to regulate the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of information by such agencies.“(b) The purpose of this Act [enacting this section and provisions set out as notes under this section] is to provide certain safeguards for an individual against an invasion of personal privacy by requiring Federal agencies, except as otherwise provided by law, to—“(1) permit an individual to determine what records pertaining to him are collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by such agencies;“(2) permit an individual to prevent records pertaining to him obtained by such agencies for a particular purpose from being used or made available for another purpose without his consent;“(3) permit an individual to gain access to information pertaining to him in Federal agency records, to have a copy made of all or any portion thereof, and to correct or amend such records;“(4) collect, maintain, use, or disseminate any record of identifiable personal information in a manner that assures that such action is for a necessary and lawful purpose, that the information is current and accurate for its intended use, and that adequate safeguards are provided to prevent misuse of such information;“(5) permit exemptions from the requirements with respect to records provided in this Act only in those cases where there is an important public policy need for such exemption as has been determined by specific statutory authority; and“(6) be subject to civil suit for any damages which occur as a result of willful or intentional action which violates any individual’s rights under this Act.”

Privacy Protection Study Commission

Pub. L. 93–579, § 5, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1905, as amended by Pub. L. 95–38, June 1, 1977, 91 Stat. 179, which established the Privacy Protection Study Commission and provided that the Commission study data banks, automated data processing programs and information systems of governmental, regional and private organizations to determine standards and procedures in force for protection of personal information, that the Commission report to the President and Congress the extent to which requirements and principles of section 552a of title 5 should be applied to the information practices of those organizations, and that it make other legislative recommendations to protect the privacy of individuals while meeting the legitimate informational needs of government and society, ceased to exist on September 30, 1977, pursuant to section 5(g) of Pub. L. 93–579.

Guidelines and Regulations for Maintenance of Privacy and Protection of Records of Individuals

Pub. L. 93–579, § 6, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1909, which provided that the Office of Management and Budget shall develop guidelines and regulations for use of agencies in implementing provisions of this section and provide continuing assistance to and oversight of the implementation of the provisions of such section by agencies, was repealed by Pub. L. 100–503, § 6(c), Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2513.

Disclosure of Social Security Number

Pub. L. 93–579, § 7, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1909, provided that:“(a)(1) It shall be unlawful for any Federal, State or local government agency to deny to any individual any right, benefit, or privilege provided by law because of such individual’s refusal to disclose his social security account number.“(2) the [The] provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not apply with respect to—“(A) any disclosure which is required by Federal statute, or“(B) the disclosure of a social security number to any Federal, State, or local agency maintaining a system of records in existence and operating before January 1, 1975, if such disclosure was required under statute or regulation adopted prior to such date to verify the identity of an individual.“(b) Any Federal, State, or local government agency which requests an individual to disclose his social security account number shall inform that individual whether that disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, by what statutory or other authority such number is solicited, and what uses will be made of it.”

Authorization of Appropriations to Privacy Protection Study Commission

Pub. L. 93–579, § 9, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1910, as amended by Pub. L. 94–394, Sept. 3, 1976, 90 Stat. 1198, authorized appropriations for the period beginning July 1, 1975, and ending on September 30, 1977.

Executive DocumentsEx. Ord. No. 9397. Numbering System for Federal Accounts Relating to Individual Persons

Ex. Ord. No. 9397, Nov. 22, 1943, 8 F.R. 16095, as amended by Ex. Ord. No. 13478, § 2, Nov. 18, 2008, 73 F.R. 70239, provided:

WHEREAS certain Federal agencies from time to time require in the administration of their activities a system of numerical identification of accounts of individual persons; and

WHEREAS some seventy million persons have heretofore been assigned account numbers pursuant to the Social Security Act; and

WHEREAS a large percentage of Federal employees have already been assigned account numbers pursuant to the Social Security Act; and

WHEREAS it is desirable in the interest of economy and orderly administration that the Federal Government move towards the use of a single, unduplicated numerical identification system of accounts and avoid the unnecessary establishment of additional systems:

NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

1. Hereafter any Federal department, establishment, or agency may, whenever the head thereof finds it advisable to establish a new system of permanent account numbers pertaining to individual persons, utilize the Social Security Act account numbers assigned pursuant to title 20, section 422.103 of the Code of Federal Regulations and pursuant to paragraph 2 of this order.

2. The Social Security Administration shall provide for the assignment of an account number to each person who is required by any Federal agency to have such a number but who has not previously been assigned such number by the Administration. The Administration may accomplish this purpose by (a) assigning such numbers to individual persons, (b) assigning blocks of numbers to Federal agencies for reassignment to individual persons, or (c) making such other arrangements for the assignment of numbers as it may deem appropriate.

3. The Social Security Administration shall furnish, upon request of any Federal agency utilizing the numerical identification system of accounts provided for in this order, the account number pertaining to any person with whom such agency has an account or the name and other identifying data pertaining to any account number of any such person.

4. The Social Security Administration and each Federal agency shall maintain the confidential character of information relating to individual persons obtained pursuant to the provisions of this order.

5. There shall be transferred to the Social Security Administration, from time to time, such amounts as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall determine to be required for reimbursement by any Federal agency for the services rendered by the Administration pursuant to the provisions of this order.

6. This order shall be implemented in accordance with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

7. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

8. This order shall be published in the Federal Register.

Classified National Security Information

For provisions relating to a response to a request for information under this section when the fact of its existence or nonexistence is itself classified or when it was originally classified by another agency, see Ex. Ord. No. 13526, § 3.6, Dec. 29, 2009, 75 F.R. 718, set out as a note under section 3161 of Title 50, War and National Defense.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3,286 cases (633 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Sussman v. United States Marshals Serv., 494 F.3d 1106 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sussman v. United States Marshals Serv., 494 F.3d 1106 (D.C. Cir. 2007). · cites it 17× “V Sussman’s remaining claims all rely on the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. We consider first Count II, in which Suss-man again seeks disclosure of the materials described above.”

Wilson v. Libby, 535 F.3d 697 (D.C. Cir. 2008). · cites it 24× “The Wilsons' Bivens claims were based on alleged violations of their Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection of the laws, of Joseph Wilson's First Amendment right to freedom of speech, and of Valerie Wilson's Fifth Amendment rights to privacy and property, with each claim…”

McCready, Sheila v. Nicholson, R. James, 465 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2006). · cites it 24× “Appellant Sheila McCready claims that her employer, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), violated various provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, in investigating allegations of misconduct in her office.”

Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614 (2004). · cites it 16× “See 5 U. S. C. § 552a(b). Doe joined with six other black lung claimants to sue the Department of Labor, alleging repeated violations of the Act and seeking certification of a class of "`all claimants for Black Lung Benefits since the passage of the Privacy Act.”

Beaven v. United States Dep't of Just., 622 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 20× “1896 (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 552a). The Senate Report accompanying the original Senate version of the Act states that one of the purposes of the Act is "to prevent the kind of illegal, unwise, overbroad, investigation and record surveillance of law-abiding citizens…”

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). · cites it 16× “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

John G. Gowan v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 148 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 1998). · cites it 41× “Major Gowan filed this suit ill the district court under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, on January 25, 1990. He sought injunctive relief and compensatory damages for the Air Force’s refusal to amend documents or to allow him to attach statements of disagreement; its denying…”

Speaker v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 623 F.3d 1371 (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 14× “HULL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Andrew Harley Speaker (“Speaker”) sued the Defendant United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) for violating the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, by disclosing his identity and…”

Pippinger v. Treasury, 129 F.3d 519 (10th Cir. 1997). · cites it 37× “Pippinger sued the IRS, alleging violations of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1994). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the IRS.”

Jane Doe v. United States of Am., 821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987). · cites it 28× “See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) (definition of “maintain”).”

Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Just., 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010). · cites it 28× “Privacy Act Allegations The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq., “imposes a set of substantive obligations on agencies that maintain systems of records.”

Fed. Aviation Admin. v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441 (2012). · cites it 9× “The Privacy Act of 1974, codified in part at 5 U. S. C. §552a, contains a comprehensive and detailed set of requirements for the management of confidential records held by Executive Branch agencies.”

Show all 3,286 citing cases →

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(1) — 3 cases

Sculimbrene v. Reno, 158 F. Supp. 2d 26 (D.D.C. 2001).

United States v. Chandler, 220 F. Supp. 2d 165 (E.D.N.Y 2002).

Miller v. Facebook Inc. (D.D.C. 2020).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(1)(1) — 1 case

Rashid El Malik v. Dep't of Vet. Affairs (C.D. Cal. 2020).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(12) — 1 case

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(1976) — 2 cases

Am. Fed. of Gov. Emp., Etc. v. Schlesinger, 443 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1978).

Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 421 v. Schlesinger, 443 F. Supp. 431 (D.D.C. 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(2) — 2 cases

Corey v. United States Postal Serv., 485 F. App'x 228 (9th Cir. 2012).

Legality & Propriety of FBI Acquisition of Private Papers (OLC 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(2)(5) — 1 case

Cheng v. Bureau of Labour Statistics (D. Maryland 2024).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(3)(4)(D) — 2 cases

Tran v. United States Dep't of the Treasury (D.D.C. 2019).

Dinh Tran v. Dep't of Treasury, 351 F. Supp. 3d 130 (D.C. Cir. 2019).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(3)(A) — 1 case

Reimer v. United States, 43 F. Supp. 2d 232 (N.D.N.Y. 1999).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(4) — 2 cases

Wilson v. Libby, 535 F.3d 697 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “The Wilsons' Bivens claims were based on alleged violations of their Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection of the laws, of Joseph Wilson's First Amendment right to freedom of speech, and of Valerie Wilson's Fifth Amendment rights to privacy and property, with each claim…”

Matthew Keil v. Jim O'Sullivan, etc. (Va. Ct. App. 2024).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(4)(B) — 1 case

Patton v. United States (D.D.C. 2016).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(4)(E) — 1 case

Susan D. Goland & Patricia B. Skidmore v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 607 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(5) — 3 cases

McCready, Sheila v. Nicholson, R. James, 465 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “Appellant Sheila McCready claims that her employer, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), violated various provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, in investigating allegations of misconduct in her office.”

Barnard v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (D.D.C. 2009).

FBI Disclosure to Local or State Law Enf't Agency of Pers. Info. Obtained From Another Law Enf't Agency (OLC 1979).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(5)(2012) — 1 case

Menchu v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 965 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (D. Or. 2013).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(7) — 3 cases

United States Postal Serv. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio, 9 F.3d 138 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Richardson v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 248 F. Supp. 3d 91 (D.D.C. 2017).

Jones v. Runyon, 32 F. Supp. 2d 873 (N.D.W. Va. 1998).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(B)(7) — 1 case

Florida Med. Ass'n v. Dep't of Health, Educ., & Welfare, 947 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a) — 32 cases

Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of Am., Dep't of State, 617 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1979).

Yassir Fazaga v. Fbi, 916 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2019).

United States of Am. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., Appellant, 638 F.2d 570 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Janet A. Beaulieu v. United States of Am., Internal Revenue Serv., 865 F.2d 1351 (1st Cir. 1989).

Dodge v. Trs. of the Nat'l Gallery of Art, 326 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(1) — 29 cases

Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC, 46 F.4th 159 (3rd Cir. 2022).

Dale v. Exec. Off. of the President, 164 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D.D.C. 2001).

Edward J. Petrus, M.D. v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendants, 833 F.2d 581 (5th Cir. 1987).

Alexander v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 691 F. Supp. 2d 182 (D.D.C. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(12) — 1 case

Carton v. Reno, 310 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2002).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(2) — 36 cases

Cudzich v. United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 886 F. Supp. 101 (D.D.C. 1995).

Erik Unt v. The Aerospace Corp., United States Air Force, Space & Missile Sys. Org., & Air Force Sys. Command, 765 F.2d 1440 (9th Cir. 1985).

Shermco Indus., Inc. v. Sec'y of the United States Air Force, 452 F. Supp. 306 (N.D. Tex. 1978).

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,925 Dresser Indus., Inc., a Corp., on Its Own Behalf & on Behalf of Certain Dresser Employees v. United States, 596 F.2d 1231 (5th Cir. 1979).

Melba A. Raven v. Panama Canal Co./canal Zone Gov't, 583 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) — 18 cases

Yassir Fazaga v. Fbi, 916 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2019).

Runkle v. Gonzales, 391 F. Supp. 2d 210 (D.D.C. 2005).

Richard C. Bartel v. Fed. Aviation Admin. Richard C. Bartel v. United States, 725 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Mickey Downie David Wheat v. City of Middleburg Heights, Richard P. Siegel Thomas Schneider, 301 F.3d 688 (6th Cir. 2002).

Jane Doe v. United States of Am., 821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) (definition of “maintain”).”

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3)(A) — 1 case

Negley v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 305 F. Supp. 3d 36 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(4) — 148 cases

Speaker v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 623 F.3d 1371 (11th Cir. 2010). “HULL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Andrew Harley Speaker (“Speaker”) sued the Defendant United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) for violating the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, by disclosing his identity and…”

Doe v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs of US, 519 F.3d 456 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pierce v. Dep't of the United States Air Force, 512 F.3d 184 (5th Cir. 2007).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(4)(5) — 1 case

Minshew v. Donley, 911 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (D. Nev. 2012).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(5) — 136 cases

Maydak v. United States, 630 F.3d 166 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

Pippinger v. Treasury, 129 F.3d 519 (10th Cir. 1997). “Pippinger sued the IRS, alleging violations of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1994). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the IRS.”

Doe v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs of US, 519 F.3d 456 (8th Cir. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(6) — 2 cases

Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., 777 F.3d 518 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(6)(B)(i) — 1 case

Allen v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 263 F. Supp. 3d 236 (D.D.C. 2017).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(6)(B)(iii) — 1 case

Allen v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 263 F. Supp. 3d 236 (D.D.C. 2017).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(7) — 74 cases

Doe v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 451 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2006).

United States Postal Serv. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio, 9 F.3d 138 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Townsend v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 3d 280 (D.D.C. 2017).

Britt, Stephen J. v. Naval Investigative Serv., 886 F.2d 544 (3rd Cir. 1989).

John Doe v. Joseph Digenova, 779 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(8) — 1 case

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Participation in Comput. Matching Prog. with Dep't of Educ. (OLC 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(8)(A) — 1 case

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(i) — 1 case

Morales v. New York, 22 F. Supp. 3d 256 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(l) — 37 cases

Broaddrick v. Exec. Off. of the President, 139 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2001).

Burch v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc., 551 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2008).

Willis v. United States Dep't of Just., 581 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D.D.C. 2008).

United States v. Streich, 560 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(aX3) — 1 case

Michael T. Albright v. United States of Am., 631 F.2d 915 (D.C. Cir. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(aX4) — 1 case

United States Participation in Interpol Computerized Search File Proj. (OLC 1981).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(aXl) — 1 case

Diamond v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 532 F. Supp. 216 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) — 531 cases

Beaven v. United States Dep't of Just., 622 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2010). “1896 (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. § 552a). The Senate Report accompanying the original Senate version of the Act states that one of the purposes of the Act is "to prevent the kind of illegal, unwise, overbroad, investigation and record surveillance of law-abiding citizens…”

Doe v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs of US, 519 F.3d 456 (8th Cir. 2008).

Sussman v. United States Marshals Serv., 494 F.3d 1106 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “V Sussman’s remaining claims all rely on the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. We consider first Count II, in which Suss-man again seeks disclosure of the materials described above.”

United States Dep't of Just. v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(1) — 50 cases

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of Am. (Two Cases.) Melvin D. Reuber v. Food Chem. News (Two Cases.), 750 F.2d 1039 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Minshew v. Donley, 911 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (D. Nev. 2012).

Howard v. Marsh, 596 F. Supp. 1107 (E.D. Mo. 1984).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(10) — 1 case

The Dep't of Just. Inspector Gen.'s Access to Info. Protected by the Fed. Wiretap Act, Rule 6(e) of the Fed. Rules of Crim. Procedure, & Section 626 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (OLC 2015).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) — 75 cases

Ross J. Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp., 348 F. Supp. 3d 394 (M.D. Penn. 2018).

State v. Branch, 417 P.3d 1141 (N.M. Ct. App. 2018).

June T. Perry v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 734 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1984).

United States v. Kelly, 40 M.J. 558 (1994).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(12) — 5 cases

Ritter v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025).

Alabi v. Rollins (D.N.M. 2025).

Monk (D. Conn. 2026).

Pendergraft (W.D. Okla. 2026).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(2) — 103 cases

United States Dep't of Def. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 510 U.S. 487 (1994).

United States Dep't of Just. v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989).

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

Chang v. Dep't of the Navy, 314 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D.D.C. 2004).

Fischer v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 596 F. Supp. 2d 34 (D.D.C. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(3) — 91 cases

United States Dep't of Def. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 510 U.S. 487 (1994).

People v. Carpenter, 988 P.2d 531 (Cal. 1999).

Townsend v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 3d 280 (D.D.C. 2017).

Doe v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 451 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(5) — 2 cases

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

Michael G. Devine v. United States, 202 F.3d 547 (2d Cir. 2000).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(6) — 1 case

Whatley v. City of North Charleston (D.S.C. 2024).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(7) — 33 cases

Consumers' Checkbook, Ctr. for the Study of Servs. v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 554 F.3d 1046 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Tomas Reyes v. The Supervisor of the Drug Enf't Admin., 834 F.2d 1093 (1st Cir. 1987).

Kerns v. Bd. of Com'rs of Bernalillo Cnty., 707 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D.N.M. 2010).

John Doe v. William H. Webster, Dir., Fbi, 606 F.2d 1226 (D.C. Cir. 1979).

Alley v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 590 F.3d 1195 (11th Cir. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(7)(A) — 2 cases

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'n, 467 F. Supp. 2d 40 (D.D.C. 2006).

Blackwell v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation (D.D.C. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(8) — 4 cases

Dick v. Holder, 67 F. Supp. 3d 167 (D.D.C. 2014).

DePlanche v. Califano, 549 F. Supp. 685 (W.D. Mich. 1982).

Just. v. Fuddy, 253 P.3d 665 (Haw. App. 2011).

Stafford v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 437 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (N.D. Cal. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(9) — 6 cases

Chang v. Dep't of the Navy, 314 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D.D.C. 2004).

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

Michael G. Devine v. United States, 202 F.3d 547 (2d Cir. 2000).

Therese Marie Swenson v. United States Postal Serv. Anthony M. Fank, Postmaster Gen., 890 F.2d 1075 (9th Cir. 1989).

Requests by Individual Members of Cong. for Exec. Branch Info. (OLC 2019).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(S) — 1 case

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(j)(2) — 1 case

Rodriguez v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation (D.D.C. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(l) — 47 cases

Britt, Stephen J. v. Naval Investigative Serv., 886 F.2d 544 (3rd Cir. 1989).

Lamb v. Millennium Challenge Corp., 228 F. Supp. 3d 28 (D.D.C. 2017).

Luster v. Vilsack, 667 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 2011).

Logan v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 357 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D.D.C. 2004).

Bigelow v. Dep't of Def., 217 F.3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(l)(12) — 1 case

York v. McHugh, 698 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(ll) — 35 cases

Paul Laxalt v. C.K. McClatchy, 809 F.2d 885 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

John Doe v. Joseph Digenova, 779 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

In Re: Gordon R. England, Sec'y of the Navy, 375 F.3d 1169 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

In Re Thomas Francis Barrett, Jr., Debtor. Thomas Francis Barrett, Jr. v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp., 487 F.3d 353 (6th Cir. 2007).

In re A Motion for a Standing Order, 1 Vet. App. 555 (Vet. App. 1990).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(bX2) — 1 case

Porter v. United States Dep't of Just., 551 F. Supp. 595 (E.D. Pa. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c) — 18 cases

Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Just., 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010). “Privacy Act Allegations The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq., “imposes a set of substantive obligations on agencies that maintain systems of records.”

Richard C. Bartel v. Fed. Aviation Admin. Richard C. Bartel v. United States, 725 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Maydak v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 254 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2003).

Doe v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, 706 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2009).

Big Ridge, Inc. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 715 F.3d 631 (7th Cir. 2013).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(1) — 2 cases

Plunkett v. Dep't of Just., 924 F. Supp. 2d 289 (D.D.C. 2013).

Sussman v. United States Marshals Serv. (D.D.C. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(1)(A) — 2 cases

Convertino v. United States Dep't of Just., 769 F. Supp. 2d 139 (D.D.C. 2011).

Sieverding v. United States Gov't (D.D.C. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(3) — 4 cases

Lee v. Fed. Bureau of Investigations, 172 F. Supp. 3d 304 (D.D.C. 2016).

Ray v. United States Dep't of Just., 558 F. Supp. 226 (D.D.C. 1982).

Frydman v. Dep't of Just., 760 F. Supp. 193 (D. Kan. 1991).

Edwards-Yu v. DeJoy (W.D. Wash. 2022).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(4) — 1 case

Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC, 46 F.4th 159 (3rd Cir. 2022).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(6) — 1 case

Salinas v. New Mexico State Police Dep't, 610 F. App'x 802 (10th Cir. 2015).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(l) — 6 cases

Robert Clarkson v. Internal Revenue Serv. & John Henderson, Dist. Dir., Defendants, 811 F.2d 1396 (11th Cir. 1987).

United States v. Deuerling, 210 F. Supp. 3d 717 (W.D. Pa. 2016).

Sussman v. United States Marshals Serv., 734 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2010).

Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees v. Greenberg, 789 F. Supp. 430 (D.D.C. 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(c)(l)(A) — 2 cases

Ely v. Dep't of Just., 610 F. Supp. 942 (N.D. Ill. 1985).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d) — 138 cases

Chambers v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 568 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Lopez v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 301 F. Supp. 3d 78 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Reginald Kirtz v. Trans Union LLC, 46 F.4th 159 (3rd Cir. 2022).

Ford v. Dep't of Just., 208 F. Supp. 3d 237 (D.D.C. 2016).

Antonelli v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 591 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(1) — 107 cases

Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018).

Lopez v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 301 F. Supp. 3d 78 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Ewell v. United States Dep't of Just. Crim. Div., 153 F. Supp. 3d 294 (D.D.C. 2016).

Jorge Rojas v. Faa, 941 F.3d 392 (9th Cir. 2019).

Chambers v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 568 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(1)(3) — 1 case

Robert B. Clarkson v. Internal Revenue Serv. & John Henderson, Dist. Dir., 678 F.2d 1368 (11th Cir. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(2) — 71 cases

Crummey v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 794 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.D.C. 2011).

Toolasprashad v. Bureau of Prisons, 286 F.3d 576 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Otero v. Dep't of Just., 292 F. Supp. 3d 245 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of Am. Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of Am., Litton Indus., Inc., 829 F.2d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Liguori v. Alexander, 495 F. Supp. 641 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(2)(A) — 8 cases

United States v. Tinklenberg, 131 S. Ct. 2007 (2011).

Donna L. Nichols v. Bd. of Trs. of the Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Plan, 835 F.2d 881 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pacheco v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 470 F. Supp. 1091 (D.P.R. 1979).

Englerius v. Vets. Admin., 837 F.2d 895 (9th Cir. 1988).

Kennedy v. Andrus, 459 F. Supp. 240 (D.D.C. 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(2)(B) — 9 cases

Risley v. Hawk, 918 F. Supp. 18 (D.D.C. 1996).

Herbert E. Dickson v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 828 F.2d 32 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Diana Douglas v. Agric. Stabilization & Conservation Serv., 33 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 1994).

Holz v. Westphal, 217 F. Supp. 2d 50 (D.D.C. 2002).

David Campeau, Jr. v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 575 F. App'x 35 (3rd Cir. 2014).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(2)(B)(i) — 10 cases

Pellegrino v. United States Transp. Sec. Admin., 855 F. Supp. 2d 343 (E.D. Pa. 2012).

J. Roderick MacArthur Found. & Lance E. Lindblom v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 102 F.3d 600 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

Frank A. England, III v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 798 F.2d 350 (9th Cir. 1986).

Turner v. Dep't of Army, 447 F. Supp. 1207 (D.D.C. 1978).

Reinbold v. Evers, 187 F.3d 348 (4th Cir. 1999).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(2)(B)(ii) — 6 cases

Frank A. England, III v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 798 F.2d 350 (9th Cir. 1986).

Turner v. Dep't of Army, 447 F. Supp. 1207 (D.D.C. 1978).

Thomas C. Harper v. Mitchell Kobelinski, Adm'r, Small Bus. Admin., 589 F.2d 721 (D.C. Cir. 1978).

Ertell v. Dep't of the Army, 626 F. Supp. 903 (C.D. Ill. 1986).

Lyon v. United States, 94 F.R.D. 69 (W.D. Okla. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(3) — 42 cases

John G. Gowan v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 148 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 1998). “Major Gowan filed this suit ill the district court under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, on January 25, 1990. He sought injunctive relief and compensatory damages for the Air Force’s refusal to amend documents or to allow him to attach statements of disagreement; its denying…”

Jane Doe v. United States of Am., 821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) (definition of “maintain”).”

Blazy v. Tenet, 979 F. Supp. 10 (D.D.C. 1997).

M.K. v. Tenet, 216 F.R.D. 133 (D.D.C. 2002).

Reinbold v. Evers, 187 F.3d 348 (4th Cir. 1999).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(4) — 4 cases

Frank O. Castaneda v. Gary L. Henman, 914 F.2d 981 (7th Cir. 1990).

Henry M. Vymetalik v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 785 F.2d 1090 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

Doe v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 451 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2006).

Gregory J. Wentz v. Dep't of Just., 772 F.2d 335 (7th Cir. 1985).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(5) — 32 cases

Smiertka v. United States Dept. of Treasury, Etc., 447 F. Supp. 221 (D.D.C. 1978).

Mobley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 924 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2013).

Betty Martin v. Off. of Special Couns., Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 819 F.2d 1181 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

David Carney v. United States Dep't of Just., 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994).

Jeffrey M. Louis, Dpm v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, an Exec. Dep't of the United States, 419 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2005).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(8) — 1 case

Majid v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 245 F. Supp. 3d 63 (D.D.C. 2017).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(b)(i) — 1 case

Wilson v. McHugh, 842 F. Supp. 2d 310 (D.D.C. 2012).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(l) — 110 cases

Broaddrick v. Exec. Off. of the President, 139 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2001).

Murray v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 741 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2010).

Makky v. Chertoff, 541 F.3d 205 (3rd Cir. 2008).

Mulhern v. Gates, 525 F. Supp. 2d 174 (D.D.C. 2007).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e) — 53 cases

Richard C. Bartel v. Fed. Aviation Admin. Richard C. Bartel v. United States, 725 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Gerlich v. United States Dep't of Just., 711 F.3d 161 (D.C. Cir. 2013).

Schoenman v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 575 F. Supp. 2d 136 (D.D.C. 2008).

Corbett v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 968 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Schmitt v. City of Detroit, 267 F. Supp. 2d 718 (E.D. Mich. 2003).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(1) — 22 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of Am. (Two Cases.) Melvin D. Reuber v. Food Chem. News (Two Cases.), 750 F.2d 1039 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Alexander v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 971 F. Supp. 603 (D.D.C. 1997).

Kassel v. United States Vets.' Admin., 709 F. Supp. 1194 (D.N.H. 1989).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(10) — 38 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Fed. Aviation Admin. v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1441 (2012). “The Privacy Act of 1974, codified in part at 5 U. S. C. §552a, contains a comprehensive and detailed set of requirements for the management of confidential records held by Executive Branch agencies.”

Richard Beck v. Robert McDonald, 848 F.3d 262 (4th Cir. 2017).

Cooper v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 622 F.3d 1016 (9th Cir. 2010).

In Re: U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data Sec. Breach Litig., 266 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(11) — 1 case

League of Women Voters v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (D.D.C. 2026).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(2) — 56 cases

Louis P. Cardamone v. William H. Cohen, 241 F.3d 520 (6th Cir. 2001).

Richard L. Waters v. Richard Thornburgh, 888 F.2d 870 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Peter B. v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 620 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2009).

Velikonja v. Mueller, 362 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3) — 27 cases

Louis P. Cardamone v. William H. Cohen, 241 F.3d 520 (6th Cir. 2001).

Houston v. United States Dep't of Treasury, 494 F. Supp. 24 (D.D.C. 1979).

Thompson v. Dep't of State, 400 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005).

United States of Am. & S. Lee Rabney, Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Serv. v. Theodore M. McAnlis, 721 F.2d 334 (11th Cir. 1983).

Doe v. United States Dep't of Just., 660 F. Supp. 2d 31 (D.D.C. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3)(A) — 6 cases

Glasgold v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 558 F. Supp. 129 (E.D.N.Y 1982).

Sweeney v. Chertoff, 178 F. App'x 354 (5th Cir. 2006).

Shane v. Buck, 658 F. Supp. 908 (D. Utah 1985).

Covert v. Herrington, 667 F. Supp. 730 (E.D. Wash. 1987).

Reimer v. United States, 43 F. Supp. 2d 232 (N.D.N.Y. 1999).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3)(B) — 1 case

Thompson v. Dep't of State, 400 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3)(C) — 8 cases

United States Postal Serv. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio, 9 F.3d 138 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Cooper v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 816 F. Supp. 2d 778 (N.D. Cal. 2008).

Doe v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 451 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2006).

Mandel v. U.S. Off. Pers. Mgmt., 79 F. App'x 479 (2d Cir. 2003).

Senior Executives Ass'n v. United States, 891 F. Supp. 2d 745 (D. Maryland 2012).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3)(D) — 1 case

United States v. David B. Wilber, 696 F.2d 79 (8th Cir. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3)(c) — 1 case

Flock v. United States Dep't of Transp., 136 F. Supp. 3d 138 (D. Mass. 2015).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4) — 40 cases

Krieger v. United States Dep't of Just., 529 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2008).

Wanda Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr., 694 F.2d 1270 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4)(A) — 3 cases

McCready v. Principi, 297 F. Supp. 2d 178 (D.D.C. 2003).

McCready v. Nicholson, 509 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D.D.C. 2007).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4)(B) — 2 cases

Local 2047, Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Def. Gen. Supply Ctr., 573 F.2d 184 (4th Cir. 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4)(D) — 38 cases

United States Postal Serv. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio, 9 F.3d 138 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Harper v. United States, 423 F. Supp. 192 (D.S.C. 1976).

John Doe v. Joseph Digenova, 779 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Britt, Stephen J. v. Naval Investigative Serv., 886 F.2d 544 (3rd Cir. 1989).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4)(E) — 2 cases

Doe v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 544 F. Supp. 530 (D. Maryland 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4)(G) — 3 cases

Hillier v. Cent. Intelligence Agency (D.D.C. 2018).

Carlborg v. Dep't of the Navy (D.D.C. 2020).

Cabezas v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation (D.D.C. 2022).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(4)(I) — 1 case

Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Just., 910 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D.D.C. 2012).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(5) — 202 cases

Jane Doe v. United States of Am., 821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) (definition of “maintain”).”

Gerlich v. United States Dep't of Just., 711 F.3d 161 (D.C. Cir. 2013).

Skinner v. United States Dep't of Just. & Bureau of Prisons, 584 F.3d 1093 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Robert H. Fendler v. United States Bureau of Prisons Charles A. Turnbo, Warden, F.C.I. Pleasanton, 846 F.2d 550 (9th Cir. 1988).

W. Foster Sellers v. Bureau of Prisons, 959 F.2d 307 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(6) — 40 cases

Lamb v. Millennium Challenge Corp., 228 F. Supp. 3d 28 (D.D.C. 2017).

Peter B. v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 620 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2009).

Feldman v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 797 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2011).

Richard C. Bartel v. Fed. Aviation Admin. Richard C. Bartel v. United States, 725 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Krieger v. United States Dep't of Just., 529 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(7) — 79 cases

Yassir Fazaga v. Fbi, 916 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2019).

Robert B. Clarkson v. Internal Revenue Serv. & John Henderson, Dist. Dir., 678 F.2d 1368 (11th Cir. 1982).

Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Mahmoud C. Bassiouni, Also Known as Cherif Bassiouni v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 436 F.3d 712 (7th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(8) — 2 cases

Paul Laxalt v. C.K. McClatchy, 809 F.2d 885 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Kassel v. United States Vets.' Admin., 709 F. Supp. 1194 (D.N.H. 1989).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(9) — 10 cases

Chambers v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 568 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Doe v. United States Dep't of Just., 660 F. Supp. 2d 31 (D.D.C. 2009).

Krieger v. United States Dep't of Just., 529 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2008).

Ciralsky v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 689 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D.D.C. 2010).

Marzen v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 632 F. Supp. 785 (N.D. Ill. 1986).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(l) — 48 cases

Broaddrick v. Exec. Off. of the President, 139 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2001).

William CAULFIELD Et Al., Appellants, v. the Bd. OF Educ. OF the CITY OF NEW YORK Et Al., Appellees, 583 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1978).

Jones v. Exec. Off. of the President, 167 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2001).

Robert B. Clarkson v. Internal Revenue Serv. & John Henderson, Dist. Dir., 678 F.2d 1368 (11th Cir. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(ll) — 3 cases

John Doe v. Joseph Digenova, 779 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Local 2047, Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Def. Gen. Supply Ctr., 423 F. Supp. 481 (E.D. Va. 1976).

Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. Dep't of Com., 954 F.2d 994 (4th Cir. 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(f) — 12 cases

Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of Am., Dep't of State, 617 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1979).

Maxwell v. Rubin, 3 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 1998).

Doe v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 544 F. Supp. 530 (D. Maryland 1982).

Int'l Union, Sec., Police, & Fire Professionals of Am. (spfpa) v. Us Marshal's Serv., 350 F. Supp. 2d 522 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).

Eduardo M. Benavides v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons. (Two Cases). John Smith v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 995 F.2d 269 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(f)(1) — 2 cases

Sanders (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Anderson (N.D. Ill. 2026).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(f)(1)(2) — 1 case

Doe v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 544 F. Supp. 530 (D. Maryland 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(f)(3) — 5 cases

Eduardo M. Benavides v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons. (Two Cases). John Smith v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 995 F.2d 269 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Hezekiah Green, Jr. v. Robert A. McDonald, 28 Vet. App. 281 (Vet. App. 2016).

Gerald W. Bavido v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 215 F.3d 743 (7th Cir. 2000).

Hammie v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 765 F. Supp. 1224 (E.D. Pa. 1991).

Cowsen-El v. United States Dep't of Just., 826 F. Supp. 532 (D.D.C. 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(f)(4) — 9 cases

Abdel Elnashar v. United States Dep't of Just. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, Minneapolis Off. Myron Umbel, & Other Unknown Fbi Agents, 446 F.3d 792 (8th Cir. 2006).

Crooker v. United States Marshals Serv., 577 F. Supp. 1217 (D.D.C. 1983).

Newmark v. Principi, 262 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2003).

Richard Lowe v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsr, 582 F. App'x 323 (5th Cir. 2014).

Touchstone Rsch. Grp. LLC v. Dep't of Def. (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(f)(5) — 2 cases

Byron L. Taylor v. United States Treasury Dep't, Internal Revenue Serv., 127 F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 1997).

Shermco Indus., Inc. v. Sec'y of the United States Air Force, 452 F. Supp. 306 (N.D. Tex. 1978).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g) — 149 cases

United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871 (6th Cir. 2010).

Ramirez v. Dep't of Just., 594 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2009).

Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State & Consum. Affairs Agency Med. Bd. of California Acupuncture Comm. & Marilyn Nielsen, 191 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 1999).

Michael Alexander v. United States, 787 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1986).

Larry Raney v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 222 F.3d 927 (Fed. Cir. 2000).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1) — 130 cases

Welborn v. Internal Revenue Serv., 218 F. Supp. 3d 64 (D.D.C. 2016).

Dep't of Agric. Rural Dev. Rural Hous. Serv. v. Kirtz, 601 U.S. 42 (2024).

Gonzalez v. Leonard, 497 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Conn. 1980).

Addington v. United States, 94 Fed. Cl. 779 (Fed. Cl. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(2000) — 1 case

Hatfill v. Mukasey, 539 F. Supp. 2d 96 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(4) — 1 case

Webber v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 200 F. App'x 335 (5th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(A) — 61 cases

Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614 (2004). “See 5 U. S. C. § 552a(b). Doe joined with six other black lung claimants to sue the Department of Labor, alleging repeated violations of the Act and seeking certification of a class of "`all claimants for Black Lung Benefits since the passage of the Privacy Act.”

Yassir Fazaga v. Fbi, 916 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 2019).

Conklin v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 514 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2007).

Marino v. Dep't of Just., 993 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013).

Thomas W. Hill v. U.S. Air Force, 795 F.2d 1067 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(B) — 26 cases

Kearns v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 312 F. Supp. 3d 97 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Powell v. Internal Revenue Serv., 317 F. Supp. 3d 266 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Paul K. Voelker v. Internal Revenue Serv., 646 F.2d 332 (8th Cir. 1981).

Falwell v. Exec. Off. of the President, 158 F. Supp. 2d 734 (W.D. Va. 2001).

Newmark v. Principi, 262 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2003).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(C) — 84 cases

Chambers v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 568 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Michael E. Hubbard v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Adm'r, 809 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

John Doe v. Merrick Garland, 17 F.4th 941 (9th Cir. 2021).

Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 312 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Velikonja v. Mueller, 315 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2004).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(D) — 95 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Maydak v. United States, 630 F.3d 166 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(a) — 1 case

Mannon v. VAMC Ann Arbor (E.D. Mich. 2025).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(c) — 2 cases

Hay v. Sec'y of the Army, 739 F. Supp. 609 (S.D. Ga. 1990).

Elliott v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 547 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(1)(c)(d) — 1 case

Braun v. United States (D. Nev. 2025).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(2) — 23 cases

Chambers v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 568 F.3d 998 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Liff v. Off. of Inspector Gen. for U.S. Dep't of Labor, 881 F.3d 912 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Corbett v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 968 F. Supp. 2d 1171 (S.D. Fla. 2012).

Robert B. Clarkson v. Internal Revenue Serv. & John Henderson, Dist. Dir., 678 F.2d 1368 (11th Cir. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(2)(A) — 46 cases

Doe v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 451 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2006).

R. R. v. Dep't of the Army, 482 F. Supp. 770 (D.D.C. 1980).

Kathleen Strang v. United States Arms Control & Disarmament Agency, 864 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

Daniel Molerio v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 749 F.2d 815 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Mueller, Douglas J. v. England, Gordon R., 485 F.3d 1191 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(2)(B) — 40 cases

Marek v. Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985).

Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club, 463 U.S. 680 (1983).

Edward Haase v. William B. Sessions, Dir., F.B.I, 893 F.2d 370 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Nazareth Gates v. John Collier, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, 616 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(3) — 1 case

Kalmin v. Dep't of the Navy, 605 F. Supp. 1492 (D.D.C. 1985).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(3)(A) — 43 cases

Jeffrey M. Louis, Dpm v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, an Exec. Dep't of the United States, 419 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2005).

Rouse v. United States Dep't of State, 567 F.3d 408 (9th Cir. 2009).

Mobley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 924 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2013).

Barouch v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 962 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2013).

Byron L. Taylor v. United States Treasury Dep't, Internal Revenue Serv., 127 F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 1997).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(3)(B) — 37 cases

Phyllis A. Barrett v. Bureau of Customs & Dep't of the Treasury, 651 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir. 1981).

Lapka v. Chertoff, 517 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2008).

Mary Williams Cazalas v. United States Dep't of Just., 709 F.2d 1051 (5th Cir. 1983).

Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Serv., 656 F.2d 848 (D.C. Cir. 1981).

Buck Doe, & Robert Doe Tays Doe Otis Doe Thomas Doe Joe Doe Charles Doe Dick Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Sec'y of Labor, 435 F.3d 492 (4th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(3)(B)(4) — 2 cases

Hatch v. Demayo (M.D.N.C. 2020).

Garey v. James S. Farrin, P.C. (M.D.N.C. 2020).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(3)(a) — 1 case

James v. United States Customs & Border Prot., 549 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(3)(b) — 2 cases

Barnard v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 656 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D.D.C. 2009).

Barnard v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (D.D.C. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4) — 254 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Ross J. Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Seale v. Peacock, 32 F.4th 1011 (10th Cir. 2022).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4)(1976) — 1 case

Florida Med. Ass'n v. Dep't of Health, Educ., & Welfare, 947 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4)(2000) — 1 case

Hatfill v. Mukasey, 539 F. Supp. 2d 96 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4)(A) — 79 cases

Pichler v. UNITE, 542 F.3d 380 (3rd Cir. 2008).

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Buck Doe, & Robert Doe Tays Doe Otis Doe Thomas Doe Joe Doe Charles Doe Dick Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Sec'y of Labor, 435 F.3d 492 (4th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4)(B) — 16 cases

Doe v. Chao, 511 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 2007).

Buck Doe, & Robert Doe Tays Doe Otis Doe Thomas Doe Joe Doe Charles Doe Dick Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Sec'y of Labor, 435 F.3d 492 (4th Cir. 2006).

Vista Mktg., LLC v. Terri A. Burkett, 812 F.3d 954 (11th Cir. 2016).

Rice v. United States, 245 F.R.D. 3 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4)(a) — 3 cases

Bailets, R. v. Pa. Tpk. Comm'n, Aplt., 181 A.3d 324 (Pa. 2018).

James Kehoe v. Fid. Fed. Bank & Trust, 421 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2005).

Deirdra J. Brown v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 169 F. App'x 537 (11th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(5) — 179 cases

Robert Oja v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant Gen., 440 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2006).

Leonard Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv., 753 F.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

Chung v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 333 F.3d 273 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Dehaemers v. Wynne, 522 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D.D.C. 2007).

Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2013).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(A) — 1 case

Lyon v. United States, 94 F.R.D. 69 (W.D. Okla. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l) — 133 cases

Logan v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 357 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D.D.C. 2004).

Burch v. Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc., 551 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(4) — 4 cases

Broaddrick v. Exec. Off. of the President, 139 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2001).

Flowers v. the Exec. Off. of the President, 142 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2001).

Rivera v. Potter, 400 F. Supp. 2d 404 (D.P.R. 2005).

Smith v. Nicholson, 516 F. Supp. 2d 832 (S.D. Tex. 2007).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(A) — 62 cases

Jane Doe v. United States of Am., 821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) (definition of “maintain”).”

Kursar v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 581 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(B) — 26 cases

Mobley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 806 F.3d 568 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Broaddrick v. Exec. Off. of the President, 139 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D.D.C. 2001).

Logan v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 357 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D.D.C. 2004).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(C) — 95 cases

Jane Doe v. United States of Am., 821 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(a)(3) (definition of “maintain”).”

Velikonja v. Mueller, 362 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004).

Michael E. Hubbard v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Adm'r, 809 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(C)(D) — 2 cases

Trice v. United States Parole Comm'n, 530 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D.D.C. 2008).

De La Cruz-Jimenez v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 566 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2008).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(D) — 98 cases

Doe v. United States Dep't of Just., 660 F. Supp. 2d 31 (D.D.C. 2009).

Robert Oja v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Robert B. Flowers, Lieutenant Gen., 440 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(c) — 2 cases

Nicholson v. Carroll, 390 F. Supp. 2d 429 (D. Del. 2005).

Bettersworth v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 248 F.3d 386 (5th Cir. 2001).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(d) — 1 case

Jones v. Dep't of the Air Force, 947 F. Supp. 1507 (D. Colo. 1996).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(l)(e) — 1 case

Thomas v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 350 F. App'x 448 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(gX3)(A) — 1 case

Exner v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 612 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(gXl) — 1 case

Doe v. Sharp, 491 F. Supp. 346 (D. Mass. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(h) — 4 cases

DePlanche v. Califano, 549 F. Supp. 685 (W.D. Mich. 1982).

Whitaker v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 31 F. Supp. 3d 23 (D.D.C. 2014).

Reinbold v. Evers, 187 F.3d 348 (4th Cir. 1999).

Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion (Tex. Att'y Gen. 1988).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(i) — 11 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Richard L. Windsor v. The Tennessean, 719 F.2d 155 (6th Cir. 1984).

Ashbourne v. Hansberry, 302 F. Supp. 3d 338 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Stone v. Def. Investigative Serv., 816 F. Supp. 782 (D.D.C. 1993).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(1) — 11 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Hartley v. Wilfert, 918 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2013).

Rowe v. State of Tenn., 431 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Tenn. 1977).

Kassel v. United States Vets. Admin., 682 F. Supp. 646 (D.N.H. 1988).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(3) — 7 cases

Lapin v. Taylor, 475 F. Supp. 446 (D. Haw. 1979).

Richard C. Bartel v. Fed. Aviation Admin. Richard C. Bartel v. United States, 725 F.2d 1403 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Brown v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 742 F. Supp. 2d 126 (D.D.C. 2010).

Clemons v. Waller, 82 F. App'x 436 (6th Cir. 2003).

Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 977 F.2d 545 (11th Cir. 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(i)(l) — 9 cases

Robert Vernon Bruce v. United States of Am., the Gen. Servs. Admin. & Ralph W. McCann, 621 F.2d 914 (8th Cir. 1980).

Alexander v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 193 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2000).

United States v. Myers, 510 F. Supp. 323 (E.D.N.Y 1980).

Nakash v. United States Dep't of Just., 708 F. Supp. 1354 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j) — 76 cases

Maydak v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 254 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2003).

Jordan v. United States Dep't of Just., 668 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2011).

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

Abdelfattah v. United States Dep't of Homeland Sec., 787 F.3d 524 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Robert H. Fendler v. United States Bureau of Prisons Charles A. Turnbo, Warden, F.C.I. Pleasanton, 846 F.2d 550 (9th Cir. 1988).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(1) — 8 cases

Subh v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 760 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2011).

Snyder v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 230 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2002).

Sybil M. Alford v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 610 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1980).

Subh v. Cent. Intelligence Agency (D.D.C. 2011).

Hillier v. Cent. Intelligence Agency (D.D.C. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(2) — 217 cases

Barouch v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 962 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2013).

Mobley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 924 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2013).

Jordan v. United States Dep't of Just., 668 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2011).

Royce Corley v. DOJ, 998 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2021).

Ramirez v. Dep't of Just., 594 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2009).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(2)(A) — 3 cases

Thompson v. United States Dep't of Just. Crim. Div., 146 F. Supp. 3d 72 (D.D.C. 2015).

Garza v. United States Marshal Serv. (D.D.C. 2018).

Guarascio v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation Off. of Info. Policy (D.D.C. 2023).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(2)(B) — 7 cases

John Doe v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, John Doe v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 936 F.2d 1346 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

House v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 197 F. Supp. 3d 192 (D.D.C. 2016).

Wilkinson v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 99 F.R.D. 148 (C.D. Cal. 1983).

Rojem v. United States Dep't of Just., 775 F. Supp. 6 (D.D.C. 1991).

Palmieri v. United States of Am., 194 F. Supp. 3d 12 (D.D.C. 2016).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(2)(C) — 3 cases

Reeves v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 885 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D.D.C. 2012).

Hall v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 132 F. Supp. 3d 60 (D.D.C. 2015).

Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons, 845 F. Supp. 2d 224 (D.D.C. 2012).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(Z) — 1 case

Vazquez v. U.S. Dep't of Just. (D.D.C. 2011).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(l) — 5 cases

Mobley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 924 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2013).

Wheeler v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 271 F. Supp. 2d 132 (D.D.C. 2003).

Mahmoud Cherif Bassiouni v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 392 F.3d 244 (7th Cir. 2005).

Nakash v. United States Dep't of Just., 708 F. Supp. 1354 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

Julian R. Villanueva v. Dep't of Just., 782 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. 1986).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k) — 15 cases

Nat'l Whistleblower Ctr. v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 849 F. Supp. 2d 13 (D.D.C. 2012).

Wanda Henke & Robert Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1445 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Mahmoud Cherif Bassiouni v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 392 F.3d 244 (7th Cir. 2005).

Wanda Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(1) — 4 cases

Snyder v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 230 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2002).

Willis v. Nat'l Sec. Agency (D.D.C. 2019).

Hillier v. Cent. Intelligence Agency (D.D.C. 2018).

Donoghue v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. (D.D.C. 2024).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(2) — 45 cases

Viotti v. United States Air Force, 902 F. Supp. 1331 (D. Colo. 1995).

Jeffrey M. Louis, Dpm v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, an Exec. Dep't of the United States, 419 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2005).

Putnam v. United States Dep't of Just., 873 F. Supp. 705 (D.D.C. 1995).

Mahmoud C. Bassiouni, Also Known as Cherif Bassiouni v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 436 F.3d 712 (7th Cir. 2006).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(3) — 1 case

United States Secret Serv. Use of the Nat'l Crime Info. Ctr. (OLC 1982).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(4) — 1 case

Alan R. Smiertka v. United States Dep't of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Serv., 604 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1979).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(5) — 34 cases

Joseph P. Londrigan v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 670 F.2d 1164 (D.C. Cir. 1981).

Lamb v. Millennium Challenge Corp., 334 F. Supp. 3d 204 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

Maximo Hernandez, Jr. v. Clifford Alexander, Jr., Sec'y of the Dep't of the Army, 671 F.2d 402 (10th Cir. 1982).

Cummings v. Dep't of the Navy, 279 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Doe v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n, 483 F. Supp. 539 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(5)(2) — 1 case

Lamb v. Millennium Challenge Corp., 334 F. Supp. 3d 204 (D.C. Cir. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(6) — 5 cases

Jorge Rojas v. Faa, 941 F.3d 392 (9th Cir. 2019).

Maydak v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 254 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2003).

Kaganove v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 664 F. Supp. 352 (N.D. Ill. 1987).

Julian R. Villanueva v. Dep't of Just., 782 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. 1986).

Patton v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 626 F. Supp. 445 (M.D. Penn. 1985).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(7) — 6 cases

Gary Jackson v. Thomas Modly, 949 F.3d 763 (D.C. Cir. 2020).

Theron J. May v. Dep't of the Air Force & Verne Orr, Sec'y of the Air Force, Individually & in His Off. Capacity, 777 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1985).

Cummings v. Dep't of the Navy, 279 F.3d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Church of Scientology of Texas v. Internal Revenue Serv., 816 F. Supp. 1138 (W.D. Tex. 1993).

Theron J. May v. Dep't of the Air Force & Verne Orr, Sec'y of the Air Force, Individually & in His Off. Capacity, 800 F.2d 1402 (5th Cir. 1986).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(l) — 4 cases

Wheeler v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 271 F. Supp. 2d 132 (D.D.C. 2003).

Makky v. Chertoff, 489 F. Supp. 2d 421 (D.N.J. 2007).

Schwarz v. United States Dep't of Treasury, 131 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D.D.C. 2000).

Michael Taylor v. Nat'l Sec. Agency, 618 F. App'x 478 (11th Cir. 2015).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(l)(2) — 1 case

Montgomery v. Comey (D.D.C. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(l)(l) — 1 case

Robert Vernon Bruce v. United States of Am., the Gen. Servs. Admin. & Ralph W. McCann, 621 F.2d 914 (8th Cir. 1980).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(m) — 4 cases

United States of Am. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., Appellant, 638 F.2d 570 (3rd Cir. 1980).

Wanda Henke & Robert Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1445 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Wood v. United States, 494 F. Supp. 792 (E.D. Va. 1980).

Russell v. Dep't of the Air Force, 915 F. Supp. 1108 (D. Colo. 1996).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(m)(1) — 2 cases

U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data SEC. Breach Litig. v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 928 F.3d 42 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, provides just such a waiver of sovereign immunity.”

Moore v. Battelle Energy All., LLC (D. Idaho 2023).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(m)(l) — 1 case

In Re: U.S. Off. of Pers. Mgmt. Data Sec. Breach Litig., 266 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(n) — 3 cases

The News-Press v. U. S. Dept. of Homeland Sec., 489 F.3d 1173 (11th Cir. 2007).

Disabled Officer's Ass'n v. Rumsfeld, 428 F. Supp. 454 (D.D.C. 1977).

Doe v. Registrar of Motor Vehs., 528 N.E.2d 880 (Mass. App. Ct. 1988).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o) — 2 cases

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

Jackson v. Kennedy (D.D.C. 2026).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1) — 1 case

League of Women Voters v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (D.D.C. 2026).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(D) — 1 case

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(2)(A) — 1 case

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(l) — 1 case

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Participation in Comput. Matching Prog. with Dep't of Educ. (OLC 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(l)(A) — 1 case

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Participation in Comput. Matching Prog. with Dep't of Educ. (OLC 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(p) — 2 cases

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Participation in Comput. Matching Prog. with Dep't of Educ. (OLC 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(p)(1)(C) — 1 case

Johnson v. CIR (5th Cir. 2024).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(q) — 10 cases

Frank Derek Greentree v. U. S. Customs Serv. Frank Derek Greentree v. Drug Enf't Admin., 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982).

Shermco Indus., Inc. v. Sec'y of the United States Air Force, 452 F. Supp. 306 (N.D. Tex. 1978).

DePlanche v. Califano, 549 F. Supp. 685 (W.D. Mich. 1982).

Theron J. May v. Dep't of the Air Force & Verne Orr, Sec'y of the Air Force, Individually & in His Off. Capacity, 777 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1985).

Alfred B. Shapiro & Gregory J. Wentz v. Drug Enf't Admin., 721 F.2d 215 (7th Cir. 1984).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(q)(2) — 2 cases

Miller v. United States, 630 F. Supp. 347 (E.D.N.Y 1986).

Alfred B. Shapiro & Gregory J. Wentz v. Drug Enf't Admin., 762 F.2d 611 (7th Cir. 1985).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(q)(l) — 1 case

Quinn v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 838 F. Supp. 70 (W.D.N.Y. 1993).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(r) — 1 case

Manriquez v. DeVos, 345 F. Supp. 3d 1077 (N.D. Cal. 2018).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(t) — 6 cases

Berger v. Internal Revenue Serv., 487 F. Supp. 2d 482 (D.N.J. 2007).

Doe v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 790 F. Supp. 17 (D.D.C. 1992).

Savada v. United States Dep't of Def., 755 F. Supp. 6 (D.D.C. 1991).

Menchu v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 965 F. Supp. 2d 1238 (D. Or. 2013).

Daniels v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 650 F. App'x 502 (9th Cir. 2016).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(t)(1) — 5 cases

Royce Corley v. DOJ, 998 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2021).

Subh v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 760 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2011).

Mid-Atl. Innocence Proj. v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation (D.D.C. 2026).

Subh v. Cent. Intelligence Agency (D.D.C. 2011).

Murray v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (D.D.C. 2010).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(t)(2) — 19 cases

Schoenman v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 573 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2008).

Subh v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 760 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2011).

Murray v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 741 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2010).

Wright v. United States Dep't of Just., 121 F. Supp. 3d 171 (D.D.C. 2015).

Abdeljabbar v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms, 74 F. Supp. 3d 158 (D.D.C. 2014).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(t)(l) — 4 cases

Murray v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 741 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2010).

McChrystal v. Fairfax Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 67 Va. Cir. 171 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2005).

Palmieri v. United States of Am., 194 F. Supp. 3d 12 (D.D.C. 2016).

Fedrick v. United States Dep't of Just., 984 F. Supp. 659 (W.D.N.Y. 1997).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(u)(3)(A) — 1 case

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Participation in Comput. Matching Prog. with Dep't of Educ. (OLC 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(u)(l) — 1 case

Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Participation in Comput. Matching Prog. with Dep't of Educ. (OLC 1992).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(v) — 5 cases

Wanda Henke & Robert Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1445 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Arthur S. Bechhoefer v. U.S. Dep't of Just. Drug Enf't Admin., Robert Nearing & Jeffrey Gelina, 209 F.3d 57 (2d Cir. 2000).

Whether the United States Dep't of Labor Has the Auth. to Control the Disclosure of Fed. Emp. Comp. Act Records Held by the United States Postal Serv. (OLC 2012).

Auth. of the Dep't of Labor to Control the Disclosure of Fed. Employees' Comp. Act Records Held by the United States Postal Serv. (OLC 2012).

Exempting the Records of the SEC Fraud Surveillance Team from Reporting Obligations in the Privacy Act (OLC 2012).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(v)(1) — 1 case

Warren v. Colvin (2d Cir. 2014).

— 5 U.S.C. § 552a(v)(l) — 1 case

Warren v. Colvin, 744 F.3d 841 (2d Cir. 2014).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.