C.F.R. » Title 46 » CHAPTER IV—FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS › PART 502—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE › Subpart M—Decisions; Appeals; Exceptions

46 C.F.R. § 502.224

Separation of functions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The separation of functions as required by 5 U.S.C. 554(d) shall be observed in proceedings under subparts A to Q inclusive, of this part. [Rule 224.]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2002 · leading case: Fed. Mar. Comm'n v. South Carolina State Ports Auth., 535 U.S. 743 (2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fed. Mar. Comm'n v. South Carolina State Ports Auth., 535 U.S. 743 (2002). · cites it 2× “[9] See 46 CFR § 502.224 (2001) (requiring that ALJs be shielded from political influence in a manner consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act).”
South Carolina State Ports Auth. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 243 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 2001). “It is true that the commissioners may review the ALJ’s decision. Nevertheless, this review is still impartial.”
SC State Ports v. FMC (4th Cir. 2002). “§ 554(d) (requiring separation of functions between adjudication and prosecution in administrative hearings); 46 C.F.R. § 502.224 ("The separation of functions as required by 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.