47 C.F.R. § 73.606

Table of allotments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The table of allotments set forth in § 73.622(j) contains the channels designated for the listed communities in the United States, its Territories, and possessions. Channels designated with an asterisk are assigned for use by noncommercial educational broadcast stations only.

[86 FR 66195, Nov. 22, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1965–2001 · leading case: Wlva, Inc. (Wlva-Tv), Lynchburg, Virginia v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Roanoke Telecasting Corp. (Wrft-Tv), Intervenor, 459 F.2d 1286 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
Wlva, Inc. (Wlva-Tv), Lynchburg, Virginia v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Roanoke Telecasting Corp. (Wrft-Tv), Intervenor, 459 F.2d 1286 (D.C. Cir. 1972). · cites it 3× “I Under the Commission’s table of television allocations, 47 C.F.R. § 73.606 (1971), Stations WDBF-TV, WSLS-TV and WRFT-TV (UHF) operate on Channels 7, 10, and 27 respectively in Roanoke, Virginia, a city of approximately 100,000 nestled in the mountainous ter *1289 rain of…”
Multi-State Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Rko Gen., Inc., Intervenor, 728 F.2d 1519 (D.C. Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “4 Because Channel 13 continues to be assigned to New Jersey in the Commission’s Table of Assignments, 47 C.F.R. § 73.606 (b) (1982), Multi-State argues that New Jersey plainly is outside the scope of section 331.”
Rochelle C. Salzer v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Garnerlynn Commc'ns v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Metromedia, Inc., Intervenor, 778 F.2d 869 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “The television table of assignments, 47 C.F.R. § 73.606 (b) (1984), includes all channel assignments and specifies the use of any type of frequency offset.”
Orange Park Florida T v. Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Clay Television, Inc., Intervenor, 811 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 47 C.F.R. § 73.606 (1983) (table of channel assignments).”
Fid. Television, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Rko Gen., Inc., Intervenor, 515 F.2d 684 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “Norwalk is within 15 miles of Los Angeles. *689 Fidelity proposed to construct the station at Norwalk because it wished to orient programming of the channel to the “Southland”, an area described in Fidelity’s Petition to Enlarge Issues as the area in Los Angeles County lying to…”
Coalition for Noncommercial Media v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 249 F.3d 1005 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “60 ¶ ¶ 33-49, 253(a) (1952); see also 47 CFR § 73.606 . To modify a channel assignment, a broadcast licensee must apply to the Com *1007 mission, normally thereby exposing itself to competing license applications.”
Presque Isle Tv Co., Inc., Johnston Tv Co., Inc., Caribou Tv, Inc. v. United States of Am. & Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Van Buren Tv Cable Co., Inc. v. United States of Am. & Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 387 F.2d 502 (1st Cir. 1967). “1103 protects only 'television stations,' and these are defined so as to exclude foreign broadcasters, 47 C.F.R. 73.606, 74.1101(b); see Buckeye Cablevision, Inc.”
Presque Isle TV Co. v. United States, 387 F.2d 502 (1st Cir. 1967). “1103 protects only “television stations,” and these are defined so as to exclude foreign broadcasters, 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.606 , 74.1101(b); see Buckeye Cablevision, Inc.”
Sangre De Cristo Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 139 F.3d 953 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “See 47 C.F.R. § 73.606 . 2 . A television translator retransmits the signals of a television broadcast station to the viewing public.”
New Jersey Coalition for Fair Broad. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 574 F.2d 1119 (3rd Cir. 1978). “two cities in its promotional materials, and a modification of the Television Table of Assignment, 47 C.F.R. § 73.606 (1976), to allow a licensee to choose the particular city in which it wished to be licensed.”
Louisiana Television Broad. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 347 F.2d 808 (D.C. Cir. 1965). · cites it 2× “See 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.606 , 73.-607 (1964). If a move of transmitter site is in fact a reassignment of a channel, it may be the duty of the Commission to hold comparative hearings to determine who should operate the channel.”
Coaltn Noncmercl v. FCC, 249 F.3d 1005 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “60 p p 33-49, 253(a) (1952); see also 47 CFR 73.606. 4 To modify a channel assignment, a broadcast licensee must apply to the Commission, normally thereby exposing itself to competing license applications.”
— 47 C.F.R. § 73.606(b) — 2 cases
Louisiana Television Broad. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 347 F.2d 808 (D.C. Cir. 1965). “See 47 C.F.R. §§ 73.606 , 73.-607 (1964). If a move of transmitter site is in fact a reassignment of a channel, it may be the duty of the Commission to hold comparative hearings to determine who should operate the channel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.