C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM › Subpart 1.6—Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities

48 C.F.R. § 1.602

1.602 Contracting officers.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1985–2018 · leading case: Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States (2016) cafc · cites it 2× “” 48 C.F.R. §§ 1.602 , 2.101. Nondisclosure agreements need not incur expendi- ture; the issue here is disclosure of information, not expenditure.”
United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University (1998) ca9 · cites it 2× “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 -l(a). “No contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met.”
Gary v. United States (2005) uscfc · cites it 3× “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 -l(a). “Information on the limits of the contracting officers’ authority shall be readily available to the public and agency personnel.”
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States (2014) uscfc “Matters formerly brought under the implied contract theory are now protected under 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 — 2(b). See B & B Med. Servs.”
Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United States (2016) uscfc “According to defendant, this means that contracts were required to be awarded by a warranted contracting officer, which Deputy Director Hunter was not because she lacked a contracting officer’s warrant, pursuant to 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 (2010). The version of 32 C.”
Linc Government Services, LLC v. United States (2012) uscfc “] 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 — 2(b). . The clerical errors identified did not affect the ratings or were too minor to warrant setting aside the MATOC Contract awards.”
Pacord, Inc. v. United States of America a & E Industries, Inc. (1998) ca9 · cites it 2× “48 C.F.R. § 1.602 -l(b). One government contract requirement is contained in 48 C.”
United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University (1998) ca9 “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 -l(a). “No contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met.”
HWA, Inc. v. United States (2007) uscfc “3,1989) (citing 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 ). While there is undoubtedly a strong argument that requiring contracting officers to take into account reasonably available, current, negative past performance information safeguards the interests of the United States, this Court is unprepared…”
AEY, Inc. v. United States (2011) uscfc “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.602 -l(b). In this vein, DFARS 225.”
Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United States (2012) uscfc “” Additionally, 48 C.F.R. § 1.602-3 (c) states that the authority to ratify can only be exercised when “[t]he ratifying official has the authority to enter into a contractual commitment,” 48 C.”
Gardiner v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority (1998) ca3 “" 48 CFR § 1.602 -l(a). Part 4401 of FAR "sets forth policies and *533 procedures concerning the Federal Emergency Management Agency Acquisition Regulation (FEMAAR) System.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.