48 C.F.R. § 17.201
17.201 [Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1994–2005 · leading case: Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Env't Solutions Bus. Div. v. United States, Defendant-Cross, 178 F.3d 1260 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Env't Solutions Bus. Div. v. United States, Defendant-Cross, 178 F.3d 1260 (Fed. Cir. 1999). “48 C.F.R. § 17.201 (emphasis added). Because the option in this case was not the principal subject matter of the original bargain, the parties’ rights and obligations under the option clause are properly considered as part of the original contract between Alliant and the…”
Fluor Enter., Inc. v. United States, 64 Fed. Cl. 461 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “2562 Before the Senate Comm, on Military Affairs, 76*h Cong. 9 (1939) ("However, under the form of contract proposed in this bill, there is no advantage to the contractor in running up costs .”
Int'l Transducer Corp. v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 522 (Fed. Cl. 1994). “” 48 C.F.R. § 17.201 . Plaintiffs contract provided for definite quantities, with the option to order indefinite quantities.”
Telex Commc'ns, Inc. v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 703 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “201, 48 C.F.R. § 17.201 (1997¶, defines an option as “a unilateral right in a contract by which, for a specified time, the Government may elect to purchase additional supplies or services called for by the contract, or may elect to extend the term of the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.