48 C.F.R. § 17.501

17.501 General.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Interagency acquisitions are commonly conducted through indefinite-delivery contracts, such as task- and delivery-order contracts. The indefinite-delivery contracts used most frequently to support interagency acquisitions are Federal Supply Schedules (FSS), Governmentwide acquisition contracts (GWACs), and multi-agency contracts (MACs).

(b) An agency shall not use an interagency acquisition to circumvent conditions and limitations imposed on the use of funds.

(c) An interagency acquisition is not exempt from the requirements of subpart 7.3, Contractor Versus Government Performance.

(d) An agency shall not use an interagency acquisition to make acquisitions conflicting with any other agency's authority or responsibility (for example, that of the Administrator of General Services under title 40, United States Code, “Public Buildings, Property and Works” and 41 U.S.C. division C of subtitle I, Procurement).

[75 FR 77735, Dec. 13, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 24202, Apr. 29, 2014]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Pricewaterhousecoopers Pub. Sector, LLP v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 328 (Fed. Cl. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Pricewaterhousecoopers Pub. Sector, LLP v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 328 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “505 (listing a GWAC as an example of a task or delivéry order contract awarded by another agency and setting forth the procedures for placing orders against a GWAC), and, 48 C.F.R. § 17.501 (2016) (categorizing GWACs as a special contracting method associated with interagency…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.