48 C.F.R. § 52.211-18

52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As prescribed in 11.703(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when a fixed-price construction contract is contemplated that authorizes a variation in the estimated quantity of unit-priced items:

Variation in Estimated Quantity (APR 1984)

If the quantity of a unit-priced item in this contract is an estimated quantity and the actual quantity of the unit-priced item varies more than 15 percent above or below the estimated quantity, an equitable adjustment in the contract price shall be made upon demand of either party. The equitable adjustment shall be based upon any increase or decrease in costs due solely to the variation above 115 percent or below 85 percent of the estimated quantity. If the quantity variation is such as to cause an increase in the time necessary for completion, the Contractor may request, in writing, an extension of time, to be received by the Contracting Officer within 10 days from the beginning of the delay, or within such further period as may be granted by the Contracting Officer before the date of final settlement of the contract. Upon the receipt of a written request for an extension, the Contracting Officer shall ascertain the facts and make an adjustment for extending the completion date as, in the judgement of the Contracting Officer, is justified.

(End of clause) [48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 60 FR 48251, 48256, Sept. 18, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2008 · leading case: CEMS, Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 168 (Fed. Cl. 2003).
CEMS, Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 168 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “48 C.F.R. § 52.211-18 (1997). . The bicycle path contract contained the Changes clause (August 1987), which states: (a) The Contracting Officer may, at any time, without notice to the sureties, if any, by written order designated or indicated to be a change order, make changes…”
Burchick Constr. Co. v. United States, 83 Fed. Cl. 12 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “The construction contract variation in quantity clause, at 48 C.F.R. § 52.211-18 , ‘Variation in Estimated Quantity (Apr 1984),” was not incorporated into the contract (see 48 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.