C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS › PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES › Subpart 52.2—Text of Provisions and Clauses

48 C.F.R. § 52.215-8

52.215-8 Order of Precedence—Uniform Contract Format.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As prescribed in 15.209(h), insert the following clause:

Order of Precedence—Uniform Contract Format (OCT 1997)

Any inconsistency in this solicitation or contract shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order:

(a) The Schedule (excluding the specifications).

(b) Representations and other instructions.

(c) Contract clauses.

(d) Other documents, exhibits, and attachments.

(e) The specifications.

(End of clause) [62 FR 51261, Sept. 30, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2022 · leading case: Treadwell Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Treadwell Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). · cites it 2× “48 C.F.R. § 52.215-8 (emphasis supplied); see also AR Tab 23 at 204.”
Benefits Consulting Assocs., LLC v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 254 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 2× “See 48 C.F.R. § 52.215-8 (a). 9 Therefore, it was within the TEP’s discretion to conclude that Benalytics’ proposal complied with all Solicitation requirements.”
Sunrez Corp. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022). “215-8 provides: Any inconsistency in this solicitation or contract shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (a) The Schedule (excluding the specifications) (b) Representations and other instructions (c) Contract clauses (d) Other documents, exhibits, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.