48 C.F.R. § 9.601

9.601 Definition.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Contractor team arrangement, as used in this subpart, means an arrangement in which—

(1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or

(2) A potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2128, Jan. 10, 2001]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2023 · leading case: Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.
Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp. (1996) nyed “See 48 C.F.R § 9.601. Moreover, side agreements to joint ventures can operate lawfully as well.”
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States (1992) cc · cites it 2× “Defendant points to the FAR definition of a “contractor team arrangement” at 48 C.F.R. § 9.601 (1987): “(a) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (b) A potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other…”
City Solutions, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (2002) cand “See 48 C.F.R. § 9.601 . As among defense contractors, CCT stressed, teaming agreements are not narrowly fixed in their meaning, but instead vary with different contexts and arrangements.”
Cable & Computer Technology Inc. v. Lockheed Sanders, Inc. (2000) ca9 “48 C.F.R. § 9.601 . Arguably, the definition does not include the relationship of two subcontractors.”
Cable & Computer Technology Inc. v. Lockheed Sanders, Inc. (2000) ca9 “48 C.F.R. 9.601. Arguably, the definition does not include the relationship of two subcontractors.”
Vsolvit, LLC. v. United States (2023) uscfc “; 48 C.F.R. § 9.601 (defining an arrangement in which “(1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) A potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.