48 C.F.R. § 9903.202

9903.202 Disclosure requirements.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2012 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Oliver v. Parsons Corp., 498 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (C.D. Cal. 2006).
United States Ex Rel. Oliver v. Parsons Corp., 498 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (C.D. Cal. 2006). · cites it 3× “Parsons ES’ Failure to List I & M on its Disclosure Statement As required by the Disclosure Regulation (48 C.F.R. 9903.202) of the Cost Accounting Standards Board under Public Law 100-679, Parsons ES certified (through it’s controller at the time, M.”
Raytheon Co. v. United States, 105 Fed. Cl. 236 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “]” 48 C.F.R. § 9903.202 -l(c). Raytheon argues in response that PWF is a segment because the government treated it as a segment when the government required Raytheon to submit a CAS 413 segment closing adjustment following the sale of PWF.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.