(a) The following are definitions of terms which are prominent in this Standard. Other terms defined elsewhere in this chapter 99 shall have the meanings ascribed to them in those definitions unless paragraph (b) of this subsection, requires otherwise.
(1) Allocate means to assign an item of cost, or a group of items of cost, to one or more cost objectives. This term includes both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share from an indirect cost pool.
(2) Direct cost means any cost which is identified specifically with a particular final cost objective. Direct costs are not limited to items which are incorporated in the end product as material or labor. Costs identified specifically with a contract are direct costs of that contract. All costs identified specifically with other final cost objectives of the contractor are direct costs of those cost objectives.
(3) Indirect cost means any cost not directly identified with a single final cost objective, but identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective.
(4) Indirect cost pool means a grouping of incurred costs identified with two or more cost objectives but not identified specifically with any final cost objective.
(b) The following modifications of terms defined elsewhere in this chapter 99 are applicable to this Standard: None.
Notes of Decisions
Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 773 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
· cites it 2× “” 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30 (a)(2). For example, labor wages of a worker on a production line are direct labor costs which can be allocated directly to a contract.”
Raytheon Co. v. Comm'r of Revenue, 916 N.E.2d 372 (Mass. 2009).
· cites it 2× “See 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30 (a)(2) (2001) (defining direct cost items as “any cost which is identified specifically with a particular final cost objective”).”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 890 F.3d 1053 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“Next, UPS cites a federal *1065 accounting regulation, which actually supports the Commission's reading because it defines "[i]ndirect cost" as a cost "identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective ," 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30…”
Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 102 Fed. Cl. 38 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
“” 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30 (a)(2). 3 Correspondingly, an *42 indirect cost is “any cost not directly identified with a single final cost objective, but identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective.”
United States Ex Rel. Mayman v. Martin Marietta Corp., 894 F. Supp. 218 (D. Maryland 1995).
“48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30 . Martin Marietta suggests that a task which is in support of more than one contract must be charged to indirect costs and not to any one contract.”
Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 122 Fed. Cl. 711 (Fed. Cl. 2015).
“” 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30 (a)(2). Relatedly, an indirect cost is "any cost not directly identified with a single final cost objective, but identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective.”
Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States 09-844c &, 110 Fed. Cl. 210 (Fed. Cl. 2013).
· cites it 2× “” 48 C.F.R. § 9904.418-30 (a)(2). An indirect cost is “any cost not directly identified with a single final cost objective, but identified with two or more final cost objectives or with at least one intermediate cost objective.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.