49 C.F.R. § 1121.1
Scope
These procedures generally govern petitions filed under 49 U.S.C. 10502 to exempt a transaction or service from 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, or any provision of 49 U.S.C. subtitle IV, or to revoke an exemption previously granted. These procedures also apply to notices of exemption.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2001–2014 · leading case: Friberg v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
Friberg v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (2001)
“The Fribergs assert that § 10502 of the ICCTA, which is implemented through 49 C.F.R. § 1121.1 et seq., provides an exemption from the STB’s jurisdiction.”
Samuel C. Johnson 1988 Trust v. Bayfield County (2011)
“§ 10502 ; 49 C.F.R. §§ 1121.1 et seq. But since the line was abandoned under the old procedure, the new procedure is inapplicable and so we needn’t consider whether it provides enough notice and other process to make a judicial decía *808 ration necessary for an abandonment…”
Toews v. United States (2002)
“§ 10505 and 49 C.F.R. §§ 1121.1 et seq. The petition was granted by the STB.”
Friends of the Eel River v. N. Coast RR. Auth. (2014)
“§ 10502 ; 49 C.F.R. §§ 1121.1 et seq., 1150.31 et seq.”
Friends of the Eel River v. N. Coast RR. Auth. (2014)
“§ 10502 ; 49 C.F.R. §§ 1121.1 et seq., 1150.31 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.