49 C.F.R. § 1300.1

Scope; definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The provisions of this part address the requirements imposed on rail carriers by 49 U.S.C. 11101(b), 11101(c), 11101(d) and 11101(f).

(b) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of this part apply to any common carriage transportation or service provided by a rail carrier subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under 49 U.S.C. 10501.

(c) The provisions of this part do not apply to any transportation or service provided by a rail carrier under a contract authorized under 49 U.S.C. 10709 or former 49 U.S.C. 10713 (repealed effective January 1, 1996).

(d) The provisions of this part do not apply to any transportation or service provided by a rail carrier to the extent that such transportation or service is exempted from rate notice and disclosure requirements pursuant to an exemption issued under 49 U.S.C. 10502 or former 49 U.S.C. 10505 (repealed effective January 1, 1996).

(e) For the purposes of this part, “service terms” means all classifications, rules, and practices that affect the rates, charges, or level of service for rail transportation.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2012 · leading case: Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (2009) ca3 · cites it 3× “Except for 49 C.F.R. § 1300.1 , which defines the scope of the rules, the regulations parallel the statutory requirements.”

Babcock & Wilcox Co v. Kansas City S (2009) ca3 · cites it 3× “Except for 49 C.F.R. § 1300.1 , which defines the scope of the rules, the regulations parallel the statutory requirements.”

ABB, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2012) nced “In this case, CSXT contends that its “published rates” for rail shipment of electrical transformers in March 2006, were contained in its Price List CSXT 4605 for the classification, “Machinery,” effective December 14, 2005.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.