C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER X—SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD › SUBCHAPTER D—CARRIER RATES AND SERVICE TERMS › PART 1312—REGULATIONS FOR THE PUBLICATION, FILING, AND KEEPING OF TARIFFS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF PROPERTY BY OR WITH A WATER CARRIER IN NONCONTIGUOUS DOMESTIC TRADE

49 C.F.R. § 1312.14

Powers of attorney and concurrences

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Authorization. Rates and services of a carrier must be filed in a tariff issued in that carrier's name unless they are filed:

(1) In an agent's tariff when the carrier has executed a power of attorney authorizing that individual or entity to serve as its tariff agent; or

(2) In a tariff of another carrier through issuance of a concurrence to the latter carrier authorizing the first carrier's participation in joint rates and through routes.

(b) Disclosure of authorization. If two or more carriers execute powers of attorney to the same agent, it is not necessary for those carriers to exchange concurrences to participate in joint rates in that agent's tariffs. Powers of attorney and concurrences are not to be filed with the Board, but shall be provided to any person on request.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2022 · leading case: Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,020 in Re Olympia Holding Corp., Debtors. Lloyd T. Whitaker v. Frito-Lay, Inc., a Delaware Corp., 88 F.3d 952 (11th Cir. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,020 in Re Olympia Holding Corp., Debtors. Lloyd T. Whitaker v. Frito-Lay, Inc., a Delaware Corp., 88 F.3d 952 (11th Cir. 1996). “” 49 C.F.R. § 1312.14 (a)(3) (1995). The ICC subsequently entered sua sponte a blanket authorization granting all carriers permission to use shipper-coded rates.”
Kloosterboer Int'l Forwarding LLC v. United States of Am. (D. Alaska 2022). “67 Docket 117 at 48–49 (citing 49 C.F.R. §§ 1312.14 (a)(2), (b), 1312.16).”
Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc. v. G.R. Leonard & Co., 652 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Colo. 1987). “, 49 C.F.R. § 1312.14 . In the limited context of the facts of this case, I do not agree with defendant that the tariffs have the same force and effect as statutes or opinions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.