49 C.F.R. § 1511.9

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Sw. Airlines Co. v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 554 F.3d 1065 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Sw. Airlines Co. v. Transp. Sec. Admin., 554 F.3d 1065 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “TSA acknowledged that the language of the audit submitted by Spirit complied with the requirements of the relevant regulation, 49 C.F.R. § 1511.9 , yet declined to classify the opinion as “unqualified.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.