49 C.F.R. § 1520.17
Consequences of unauthorized disclosure of SSI
Violation of this part is grounds for a civil penalty and other enforcement or corrective action by DHS, and appropriate personnel actions for Federal employees. Corrective action may include issuance of an order requiring retrieval of SSI to remedy unauthorized disclosure or an order to cease future unauthorized disclosure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2006–2020 · leading case: In re September 11 Litig., 236 F.R.D. 164 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).
In re September 11 Litig., 236 F.R.D. 164 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). “” 49 C.F.R. § 1520.17 . 2. Obligations of Counsel to Clients Under the New York Code of Professional Responsibility, a lawyer assumes the absolute duty to represent his or her client “zealously within the bounds of the law.”
Robert Stephens v. Kirstjen Nielsen (C.D. Cal. 2020). “49 C.F.R. § 1520.17 . 9 2. Access to SSI is limited to “covered persons” with a “need to know” as set 10 forth in 49 C.”
Cynthia Alcala v. Kevin K. McAleenan (C.D. Cal. 2020). “49 C.F.R. § 1520.17 . 9 2. Access to SSI is limited to “covered persons” with a “need to know” as set 10 forth in 49 C.”
Jonathan Morris v. Chad Wolf (C.D. Cal. 2020). “49 C.F.R. § 1520.17 . 6 2. Access to SSI is limited to “covered persons” with a “need to know” as set 7 forth in 49 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.