C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER I—PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER C—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REGULATIONS › PART 172—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TABLE, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMMUNICATIONS, EMERGENCY RESPONSE INFORMATION, TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, AND SECURITY PLANS › Subpart I—Safety and Security Plans

49 C.F.R. § 172.804

Relationship to other Federal requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To avoid unnecessary duplication of security requirements, security plans that conform to regulations, standards, protocols, or guidelines issued by other Federal agencies, international organizations, or industry organizations may be used to satisfy the requirements in this subpart, provided such security plans address the requirements specified in this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Fluery v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 1:20-cv-00390 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 24, 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fluery v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. 1:20-cv-00390 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 24, 2021). · cites it 2× “See 49 C.F.R. § 172.804 . Union Pacific contends that it fulfills this regulatory requirement of a “transportation security plan” through its membership in DHS’s Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) program.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.