49 C.F.R. § 176.1

Purpose and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part prescribes requirements in addition to those contained in parts 171, 172, and 173 of this subchapter to be observed with respect to the transportation of hazardous materials by vessel.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1962–1980 · leading case: Poliskie Line Oceaniczne v. Hooker Chem. Corp., 499 F. Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).
Poliskie Line Oceaniczne v. Hooker Chem. Corp., 499 F. Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “49 C.F.R. §§ 176.1 , 176.3, 176.5. Section 176.”
Movers Conf. of Am. v. United States, 251 F. Supp. 882 (S.D. Cal. 1966). · cites it 2× “PER CURIAM: Pursuant to a motion filed by plaintiffs, this court issued an order to show cause why the defendant Interstate Commerce Commission should not be ordered to vacate its order of May 6,1964, insofar as it relates to Subsection (1) or (2) of Rule 1(a) ( 49 C.F.R. §…”
Movers Conf. of Am. v. United States, 205 F. Supp. 82 (S.D. Cal. 1962). · cites it 2× “1 The order in *84 question was promulgated by the Interstate Commerce Commission allegedly for the purpose of interpreting the term “household goods” as defined in 49 C.F.R. § 176.1 (a), hereinafter referred to as Rule 1(a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.